2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0025100313000054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Style, prosodic variation, and the social meaning of intonation

Abstract: This paper reports on an acoustic analysis of the intonational patterns of declarative questions and wh-questions produced by a group of young adults residing in a rural town of south-central Spain. Question intonation has been reported as highly variable across and within Spanish dialects; recent sociophonetic research on multiple languages suggests that intonational variation may be accounted for by speaking condition (i.e. speech style) in addition to other linguistic and social factors. This study is an in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most experimental work has focused on F0 movements in phrase-final position, due to their pragmatic, stylistic and regional variation (Estebas-Vilaplana and Prieto, 2010;Henriksen, 2009Henriksen, , 2013Henriksen, , 2014López-Bobo and Cuevas-Alonso, 2010;Prieto, 2004;Sosa, 1999). Navarro Tomás (1948), in his treatise on Spanish intonational structure, distinguishes 3 melodic contours used to signal wh-question intent, displayed in figure 2: a default falling contour (2a), a pragmatically motivated 'polite' contour characterized by a final rise (2b) and a circumflex contour characterized by a final rise-fall that communicates amazement or surprise (2c).…”
Section: Spanish Wh-question Intonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most experimental work has focused on F0 movements in phrase-final position, due to their pragmatic, stylistic and regional variation (Estebas-Vilaplana and Prieto, 2010;Henriksen, 2009Henriksen, , 2013Henriksen, , 2014López-Bobo and Cuevas-Alonso, 2010;Prieto, 2004;Sosa, 1999). Navarro Tomás (1948), in his treatise on Spanish intonational structure, distinguishes 3 melodic contours used to signal wh-question intent, displayed in figure 2: a default falling contour (2a), a pragmatically motivated 'polite' contour characterized by a final rise (2b) and a circumflex contour characterized by a final rise-fall that communicates amazement or surprise (2c).…”
Section: Spanish Wh-question Intonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L* H% configuration is well documented in Spanish question intonation, and the findings of experimental research suggest that this configuration is an artifact of read speech protocols (Henriksen, 2013;Henriksen et al, 2016, for Spanish andSavino, 2012, for Italian), although the full scope of pragmatic meanings has not been explored in full detail. Since the L* H% pattern was limited to 1 speaker, we discarded these data from our corpus and focused on the production of the remaining 14 speakers.…”
Section: Speakers and Recording Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speakers were instructed to read aloud the sentences keeping in mind a neutral context and to make their best effort to maintain the same intonational melody for all sentences. In most cases there was no need to monitor speakers, since the H þ L* L% and L þ ¡H* L% configurations are used interchangeably as the wh-question melody in this variety of Spanish (see Henriksen 2013). The topic of intonational variation in Spanish has been addressed in previous research across dialects (Prieto and Roseano 2010) and also within dialects (Henriksen 2012(Henriksen , 2013.…”
Section: Speakers and Recording Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases there was no need to monitor speakers, since the H þ L* L% and L þ ¡H* L% configurations are used interchangeably as the wh-question melody in this variety of Spanish (see Henriksen 2013). The topic of intonational variation in Spanish has been addressed in previous research across dialects (Prieto and Roseano 2010) and also within dialects (Henriksen 2012(Henriksen , 2013. Since it is known that speakers can display variability in the type of utterance-final configuration that they use (due to stylistic or pragmatic factors), we needed to ensure that each speaker was fairly consistent in order to obtain a balanced data sample in his/her corpus.…”
Section: Speakers and Recording Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation