2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/wi-iat.2013.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Style Features for Authors in Two Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative analysis was performed between the proposed and character Bi-gram methods using 200 articles by five well-known modern writers. In addition, Stuart et al [17] proposed measuring certain expressible writing style features. Its uses include author characterization for recognition in text whose authorship is disputed or unknown.…”
Section: Stylistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative analysis was performed between the proposed and character Bi-gram methods using 200 articles by five well-known modern writers. In addition, Stuart et al [17] proposed measuring certain expressible writing style features. Its uses include author characterization for recognition in text whose authorship is disputed or unknown.…”
Section: Stylistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in existing studies based on cross-lingual authorship identificaton [4,28,47,46], the number of candidate authors does not exceed 8. Our objective is to design a solution that can support hundreds of candidate authors for the given document.…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A class of existing methods rely on a certain form of internal language knowledge, e.g., a machine transla-tor [4,28,46,47]. These methods have reported a high accuracy for resourceful languages using a high dimensional feature set (i.e., word-based n-grams) [4,28,47]. However, they have the following limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary results suggest that the resulting feature set distinguished between authors and provided some power in distinguishing between languages. Full details and discussion of the results can be found in Stuart et al (2013).…”
Section: Work On Interlanguage Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%