Foundations of Stuttering 2002
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012759451-4/50004-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stuttering as Object

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although any answer to this question is merely speculative at this time, the apparent discrepancy may be related specifically to the fact that all target utterances consisted of monosyllabic CVC words that contained no consonant clusters and that were produced in isolation. It is well documented that both shorter words and words produced in isolation are less likely to result in stuttering than longer words and connected speech (Brown, 1938; Brown & Moren, 1942; Wingate, 1967; Wingate, 2002). Such short and isolated words may be only minimally taxing in terms of the CNS’ reliance on auditory feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although any answer to this question is merely speculative at this time, the apparent discrepancy may be related specifically to the fact that all target utterances consisted of monosyllabic CVC words that contained no consonant clusters and that were produced in isolation. It is well documented that both shorter words and words produced in isolation are less likely to result in stuttering than longer words and connected speech (Brown, 1938; Brown & Moren, 1942; Wingate, 1967; Wingate, 2002). Such short and isolated words may be only minimally taxing in terms of the CNS’ reliance on auditory feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One well-known phenomenon is that people who stutter become more fluent when synchronizing their speech to an external pacing signal, such as an isochronous metronome (Wingate, 2002; Wohl, 1968). Other conditions such as speaking in unison with another person (“choral speech”) (Adams & Ramig, 1980; Ingham & Carroll, 1977), and singing (Glover, Kalinowski, Rastatter, & Stuart, 1996) also have similar fluency inducing effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, figures for remission subsequent to this 1-year period tail off sharply, a fact which should caution against any substantial delay in referring a child to speech language therapy services on the grounds that the child is likely to grow out of the stammer. It is also generally believed that intervention is more effective for children under the age of 5 (British Stammering Association advice to parents, see website at http://www.stammering.org/), although some have argued that the apparent success of early intervention is due to misdiagnosis of stuttering within the population,10 and the confounding effects of spontaneous recovery. Once established beyond the early teenage years, a genuine and complete recovery from the disorder is very uncommon, although some are able to control stammering to the point that they no longer consider themselves to suffer from the disorder.…”
Section: Early Intervention and Spontaneous Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%