2018
DOI: 10.18671/scifor.v46n119.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stump regrowth and estimation of reconstituting Caatinga shrub-tree biomass under forest management

Abstract: ResumoObjetivou-se avaliar a rebrota e reconstituir a biomassa arbustiva-arbórea a partir das cepas em uma área de Caatinga sob manejo florestal em Floresta-PE, Brasil. Dois anos após intervenção em 18 parcelas foram medidas as circunferências e alturas das cepas e dos perfilhos. Foi avaliada a influência do diâmetro e da altura da cepa na brotação das espécies. Em uma área próxima e sem intervenção, foram tomados dados de diâmetro a altura da base e do peito para reconstituição da biomassa explorada. Verifico… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of sprouts per stump was considered high, with an average of 17.5 sprouts/stump. These results are in conformity with those reported by Lima et al (2018), who found a 63.4% sprouting capacity in a Caatinga vegetation located in Pernambuco state, two years after clearcutting. The number of sprouts per stump reported by the previous authors was 5.7, significantly lower than we found, probably due to the longer period after cutting (two years versus six months).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The number of sprouts per stump was considered high, with an average of 17.5 sprouts/stump. These results are in conformity with those reported by Lima et al (2018), who found a 63.4% sprouting capacity in a Caatinga vegetation located in Pernambuco state, two years after clearcutting. The number of sprouts per stump reported by the previous authors was 5.7, significantly lower than we found, probably due to the longer period after cutting (two years versus six months).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%