2020
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.274.24690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stump appendicitis: a myth that can become reality

Abstract: Stump appendicitis is a rare etiology of acute lower right quadrant abdominal pain often forgotten in the emergency room (ER). The Mac Burney scar or a previous laparoscopic appendectomy always rule out the eventuality of appendicitis and mislead management. Advanced imaging tools are more than compulsory to help correct the diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) scan is the option of choice that may be replaced if unavailable by simple ultrasound examination. The treatment is mainly surgical. We report the case … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors and literature suggest leaving behind a stump length of less than 5 mm as a longer length could allow for the fecalith impaction [ 8 ]. Therefore, it is recommended not to leave the appendiceal stump larger than 3 mm during an appendectomy [ 9 ]. Specific positional factors including a retrocecal appendix, subserosal appendix, and a duplicated appendix make it challenging to identify the cecal appendicular junction, contributing to this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors and literature suggest leaving behind a stump length of less than 5 mm as a longer length could allow for the fecalith impaction [ 8 ]. Therefore, it is recommended not to leave the appendiceal stump larger than 3 mm during an appendectomy [ 9 ]. Specific positional factors including a retrocecal appendix, subserosal appendix, and a duplicated appendix make it challenging to identify the cecal appendicular junction, contributing to this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific positional factors including a retrocecal appendix, subserosal appendix, and a duplicated appendix make it challenging to identify the cecal appendicular junction, contributing to this complication. It can be overcome by correctly identifying the appendicular base by following the cecal tenia coli and a complete dissection of any subserosal appendix [9]. A few differentials also clinically mimic SA, including Crohn's disease, residual surgical drain tract, and epiploic appendicitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the remnant stump is of sufficient length, it might be visualized as a tubular, thick-walled, fluid-filled, enhancing structure with or without an adjacent fluid collection, much like typical acute appendicitis (before initial appendectomy) [2,9]. In the era of laparoscopy a diagnostic laparoscopy may prove to be the next diagnostic and therapeutic option in case of ambiguity [10,11]. However some authors suggest that abdominal Ultra-sound may well have a high accuracy in establishing the diagnosis of stump appendicitis [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9 Diagnostic laparoscopy is the next diagnostic and therapeutic option in case of doubt. 10,11 However, abdominal ultrasound can be highly accurate in diagnosing stump appendicitis, some authors suggest. 4 Surgical resection (appendicectomy) is the most appropriate treatment in the cases reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 9 Diagnostic laparoscopy is the next diagnostic and therapeutic option in case of doubt. 10 , 11 However, abdominal ultrasound can be highly accurate in diagnosing stump appendicitis, some authors suggest. 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%