2010
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2010.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stuffed toys and speech perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
206
4
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
13
206
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While the results for male participants were inconclusive, female participants were more likely to select a raised, more Australian token from the continuum when they were in the 'Australian' condition. In a subsequent study, Hay and Drager (2010) found that the mere presence of a stuffed toy kangaroo (indicating Australia) or kiwi (indicating New Zealand) could influence listeners' responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While the results for male participants were inconclusive, female participants were more likely to select a raised, more Australian token from the continuum when they were in the 'Australian' condition. In a subsequent study, Hay and Drager (2010) found that the mere presence of a stuffed toy kangaroo (indicating Australia) or kiwi (indicating New Zealand) could influence listeners' responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Perceptual convergence or divergence effects have been investigated with various experimental perception paradigms (Strand and Johnson 1996;Niedzielski 1999;Hay et al 2006;Jannedy 2007, 2013;Hay and Drager 2010). In general, listeners are asked to categorize identical stimuli across different priming conditions.…”
Section: Perceptual Learning: Convergence and Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information can directly influence listeners' processing of speech within experimental contexts in ways that are mostly absent for text (Martin, Garcia, Potter, Melinger, & Costa, 2016;Van Berkum, Van Den Brink, Tesink, Kos, & Hagoort, 2008). Speech researchers should therefore keep in mind that, even in relatively low-level speech perception experiments, participants interpret the stimuli within a broader linguistic context in which the speaker is viewed as a social agent (Hay & Drager, 2010). A final issue that arises due to speaker differences is that even for pairs of studies that are being conducted in the same language, it is often inappropriate to use the same speech tokens in experiments conducted in different geographical locations where different accents will be the norm.…”
Section: Experimental Challenges In Studying Speech Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%