2013
DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2012.747490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying Well-being and its Environmental Impacts: A Case Study of Minimum Income Receivers in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show that for reducing carbon footprints of households, high-footprint consumer segments in particular should be addressed, and low-footprint households should not be the first ones to be made responsible for mitigation efforts. This implication is in line with the previous studies on the footprints of low-income household segments [15,16,26].…”
Section: The Estimated Carbon Footprints Of Japanese Householdssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results show that for reducing carbon footprints of households, high-footprint consumer segments in particular should be addressed, and low-footprint households should not be the first ones to be made responsible for mitigation efforts. This implication is in line with the previous studies on the footprints of low-income household segments [15,16,26].…”
Section: The Estimated Carbon Footprints Of Japanese Householdssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An existing study proposed a framework of consumer lifestyles approach that consists of (i) external environmental variables such as culture and technology, (ii) individual determinants such as attitudes, beliefs, and psychological factors, (iii) household characteristics such as household size, income, and location, (iv) consumer choices or purchases, and (v) consequences of resource use and environmental impacts [14]. As lifestyles of citizens vary within, and across countries, analyzing lifestyles and carbon footprints at the national and sub-national levels is crucial [10,16]. This paper addresses the latter, and examines the characteristics of consumer lifestyles using household survey microdata by focusing on household characteristics, patterns of consumer choices, as well as their relationship with environmental impacts in the aforementioned consumer lifestyles framework.Studies linking household expenditure survey microdata to environmentally extended input-output analysis (EEIOA) have identified some of the major determinants of high-carbon households and revealed a large variation of footprints among different groups of a population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK and other rich countries, the emissions of the minimum consumption bundle exceed those of the maximum sustainable consumption bundle-and by more than three times! Studies in other countries replicate this finding: in Finland, people receiving minimum income benefits exceed ecologically sustainable lifestyles by a wide margin [37]. This is to be expected and backs up the Swedish modelling in figure 1: C2 policies complement but do not replace C1 policies.…”
Section: Defining Sustainable Necessities In Practicementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Research has demonstrated how households are able to significantly reduce the environmental impacts of their consumption, at least temporarily (Laakso, 2017). On the other hand, studies also show how and where the greatest impediments lie to achieving a sustainable level by individual actions alone (Hirvilammi et al, 2013). The challenge is thus to transform practices-as-entities: shared patterns of consumption shaped by collective rules, infrastructures and systems of provision.…”
Section: Where Do We Stand In Terms Of Moving Towards More Sustainablmentioning
confidence: 99%