2016
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1250636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the Strength of Prediction Using Indirect Mixture Modeling: Nonlinear Latent Regression with Heteroskedastic Residuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a second clarification, our R 2 measures provide meaningful information about a regression mixture model even when prediction is not the primary objective of the analysis. Though mixture models are increasingly being used for individual prediction (e.g., Cole & Bauer, 2016; Cudeck & Henly, 2003; de Kort, Dolan, Lubke, & Molenaar, in press; Sterba & Bauer, 2014) it is still more common for analysts’ primary objective to involve description and/or explanation of theorized data-generating processes. In the latter context, our R 2 ’s serve as relatable, quantitative effect size measures that aid substantive interpretation, which has heretofore usually been qualitative and informal in mixture contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second clarification, our R 2 measures provide meaningful information about a regression mixture model even when prediction is not the primary objective of the analysis. Though mixture models are increasingly being used for individual prediction (e.g., Cole & Bauer, 2016; Cudeck & Henly, 2003; de Kort, Dolan, Lubke, & Molenaar, in press; Sterba & Bauer, 2014) it is still more common for analysts’ primary objective to involve description and/or explanation of theorized data-generating processes. In the latter context, our R 2 ’s serve as relatable, quantitative effect size measures that aid substantive interpretation, which has heretofore usually been qualitative and informal in mixture contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%