Studying the Role of Synchronized and Chaotic Spiking Neural Ensembles in Neural Information Processing

Abstract

The brain is characterized by performing many diverse processing tasks ranging from elaborate processes such as pattern recognition, memory or decision making to more simple functionalities such as linear filtering in image processing. Understanding the mechanisms by which the brain is able to produce such a different range of cortical operations remains a fundamental problem in neuroscience. Here we show a study about which processes are related to chaotic and synchronized states based on the study of in-silico implementation of Stochastic Spiking Neural Networks (SSNN). The measurements obtained reveal that chaotic neural ensembles are excellent transmission and convolution systems since mutual information between signals is minimized. At the same time, synchronized cells (that can be understood as ordered states of the brain) can be associated to more complex nonlinear computations. In this sense, we experimentally show that complex and quick pattern recognition processes arise when both synchronized and chaotic states are mixed. These measurements are in accordance with in vivo observations related to the role of neural synchrony in pattern recognition and to the speed of the real biological process. We also suggest that the high-level adaptive mechanisms of the brain that are the Hebbian and non-Hebbian learning rules can be understood as processes devoted to generate the appropriate clustering of both synchronized and chaotic ensembles. The measurements obtained from the hardware implementation of different types of neural systems suggest that the brain processing can be governed by the superposition of these two complementary states with complementary functionalities (nonlinear processing for synchronized states and information convolution and parallelization for chaotic).

Nonlinear Dynamics Measures for Automated EEG-Based Sleep Stage Detection

“…Nonlinear methods have proven to be an efficient tool in understanding the complexities of the brain [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. They help in the identification of underlying behavior of biological signals [11,50,51], such as electrocardiogram, EEG and magnetoencephalogram and thus, can be applied to all non-stationary signals.…”

A Programmer–Interpreter Neural Network Architecture for Prefrontal Cognitive Control

“…Furthermore, many computational studies or brain theories are based on the idea that brain areas can be controlled by other parts of the brain and, consequently, perform different behaviors under different conditions. 9,26,32,36,39,52,66,68,71 A new hypothesis gaining ground, on this ability of some areas to control other areas, is based on neural mechanisms that allow circuits to change their behaviors rapidly, dynamically, and reversibly, thus without changing their structure or changing (relearning) synaptic connectivity. 4 The view of the brain as a network of reusable areas that can be flexibly controlled by other areas can potentially impact the way we conceive cognitive control and hierarchical brain function.…”

A Multiple-Plasticity Spiking Neural Network Embedded in a Closed-Loop Control System to Model Cerebellar Pathologies

“…78 In particular, within the cerebellar model we will incorporate new neuronal properties like DCN pacemaking, chaotic and stochastic resonance in IOs 79,80 , and regulatory circuits like the interneuron inhibitory networks of granular and molecular layer. This would allow a careful analysis of spike patterns in the neuronal populations of the model, providing further hints of the inner structure of network computation and of its alterations in pathology.…”