2017
DOI: 10.1086/693924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying “the Political” in International Aid to Education: Methodological Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…“Aid to education has been for a long time a concern within the field of international and comparative education.” (Knutsson and Lindberg, 2017, p. 720). As China gradually rises as a global economic and political power, China will be more frequently perceived, rightly or wrongly, as an aid donor rather than in its preferred role as a South-South partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…“Aid to education has been for a long time a concern within the field of international and comparative education.” (Knutsson and Lindberg, 2017, p. 720). As China gradually rises as a global economic and political power, China will be more frequently perceived, rightly or wrongly, as an aid donor rather than in its preferred role as a South-South partner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China, along with other emerging donors, is a frequently cited example of a country that has taken an alternative aid approach. As Knutsson and Lindberg (2017) stated, "literature on the role of rising powers in the field of aid to education is still scant, and it is mainly China" (p.709). Our study provides the first systematic literature review of studies on international aid to education provided by Southern countries; taking China as an example, to summarize its aid principles and aid practice in the field of education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have used a qualitative analysis based on post-foundational and relational ontology (Macgilchrist, 2016), which employs categories in a non-essential manner (Knutsson and Lindberg, 2017); categories do not determine the content in advance, on the contrary, the particular content is a research question. This relational methodological perspective is not primarily concerned with texts but primarily tracks the relations within a situation (Boltanski and Thévenot, 2000) and is first and foremost attentive to systems and patterns of references and ‘indexicality’ of language, which configure social shapes which are highly consequential for social action (Fontdevila and White, 2013; Prior, 2003: 11–23).…”
Section: Empirical Materials and Methods – Relational Analytical Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ale i sledování a interpretace významu může zajít do sociologicky neproniknutelných lingvistických analýz, současní badatelé proto -v návaznosti na relacionistickou ontologii -dávají přednost zkoumání systémů a vzorců referencí -odkazů, které lze sociologicky uchopit, tedy to, na co je odkazováno [Knutsson, Lindberg 2017;Macgilchrist 2016;Prior 2003: 113-23]. Metodologicky se jedná o zaměření na sociálně akceptovanou normativitu (normativní základy argumentů) imanentní těmto dokumentům [Herzog 2016: 284].…”
Section: Sledování Vzorců Referencí a Vztahů Mezi Nimiunclassified