2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3900806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the Impacts of Environmental Amenities and Hazards with Nationwide Property Data: Best Data Practices for Interpretable and Reproducible Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 , our approach identifies the effect of rezoning properties into the SFHA as the result of FIRM updates over time. To build the panel model, we employ an extensively processed version of the Zillow ZTRAX database 26 , a comprehensive dataset of property transactions in the United potential social and economic consequences of overvaluation in US housing markets remain uncertain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 , our approach identifies the effect of rezoning properties into the SFHA as the result of FIRM updates over time. To build the panel model, we employ an extensively processed version of the Zillow ZTRAX database 26 , a comprehensive dataset of property transactions in the United potential social and economic consequences of overvaluation in US housing markets remain uncertain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, these findings point toward a substantial potential problem for the reproducibility and transparency of large‐scale flood loss estimation research. In the United States, as in many other countries, the aggregation of large‐scale property data is the domain of commercial endeavors, which has historically limited access to such data to well‐funded institutions and research groups, with only few notable exceptions (Nolte et al, 2021). Recent efforts to make property‐level flood risk estimates more widely available for the purpose of noncommercial research (e.g., by the First Street Foundation) are therefore laudable initiatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Nolte et al (2021), we identify residential buildings as those with corresponding ZTRAX building codes (RR101, RR102, RR000, and RR999) and at most two building footprints linked to a parcel. Remotely sensed building footprint data can omit buildings that are under tree cover or newly constructed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second is transferability: due to data limitations, damage estimates are often required for settings different from where the damage relationships are derived, calling for extrapolation [12][13][14]20 . A third is parsimony: input data demands should be light enough to facilitate application in a variety of settings and under common data constraints (Table S1) 12,20,22 . In addition to the criteria above, we propose interpretability as an additional priority for damage relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%