2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-15843-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying the Impact of Perturbation Methods on the Efficiency of GVNS for the ATSP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2. The results depicted here were obtained using the Best Improvement search strategy and an execution time limit of 1 min [14]. In addition, the provided results in Table 2 lead to the same statement that both GVNS_1 and GVNS_2 produce better results than GVNS_3 in most cases.…”
Section: Computational Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2. The results depicted here were obtained using the Best Improvement search strategy and an execution time limit of 1 min [14]. In addition, the provided results in Table 2 lead to the same statement that both GVNS_1 and GVNS_2 produce better results than GVNS_3 in most cases.…”
Section: Computational Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Table 1. The results shown here were obtained using the First Improvement search strategy and an execution time limit of 1 min [14]. The results in Table 1 indicate a definite pattern, namely that both GVNS_1 and GVNS_2 outperform GVNS_3 in most cases.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations