2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5127780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying rare events using forward-flux sampling: Recent breakthroughs and future outlook

Abstract: Rare events are processes that occur upon the emergence of unlikely fluctuations. Unlike what their name suggests, rare events are fairly ubiquitous in nature, as the occurrence of many structural transformations in biology and material sciences is predicated upon crossing large free energy barriers. Probing the kinetics and uncovering the molecular mechanisms of possible barrier crossings in a system is critical to predicting and controlling its structural and functional properties. Due to their activated nat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 471 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since brute force results contain no approximation, and they can be regarded as a benchmark for methodologies aiming to estimate J for nucleation, these results support the validity of CNT in describing the nucleation behaviour of colloidal electrolytes (at least at T* = 1). The discrepancy between the Seeding and FFS nucleation rates is somewhat not surprising since, on the one hand, it has been previously found that FFS calculations may underestimate the nucleation rate by a few orders of magnitude when the sampling is not extremely large, 26,44,114,115 and on the other, because Seeding results may also have an uncertainty (systematic + statistical) of about 3-5 orders of magnitude in the nucleation rate (see Fig. 5).…”
Section: B Crystal Nucleation Rate Of the Different Polymorphsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since brute force results contain no approximation, and they can be regarded as a benchmark for methodologies aiming to estimate J for nucleation, these results support the validity of CNT in describing the nucleation behaviour of colloidal electrolytes (at least at T* = 1). The discrepancy between the Seeding and FFS nucleation rates is somewhat not surprising since, on the one hand, it has been previously found that FFS calculations may underestimate the nucleation rate by a few orders of magnitude when the sampling is not extremely large, 26,44,114,115 and on the other, because Seeding results may also have an uncertainty (systematic + statistical) of about 3-5 orders of magnitude in the nucleation rate (see Fig. 5).…”
Section: B Crystal Nucleation Rate Of the Different Polymorphsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Future studies of more complex polymer desorption phenomena should take advantage of recent advances that modified FFS algorithms to account for time-dependent dynamics, “jumpy” dynamics, and multiple metastable states [ 14 ]. For example, a time-dependent flow field could be introduced, or the attraction between the wall and polymer may be reduced resulting in faster ‘jumps’ away from the wall, or the surface could be patterned resulting in multiple stable basins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review exposes a fundamental gap in the literature, as no published work analyzes the most basic problem of desorption of isolated chains from a simple flat surface in the absence of flow. In recent years, forward flux sampling has drastically progressed due to a repeatable workflow, innovations to reduce system constraints, and the application of the method to new fields [ 14 ]. In addition, FFS simulations use an unbiased potential and can address both equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the implementation of replica exchange comes at the expense of realistic state transition kinetics, and replica exchange is unlikely to promote sampling saddle points in the free energy landscape, thus hindering barrier-height computation, Biasing techniques such as umbrella sampling [24,25] and Metadynamics [26] can improve sampling along saddle points, but they are only useful if proper order parameters or collective variables along which slow transitions occur are known in advance, which is not the case for most proteins. Other sampling techniques such as transition-path sampling [27,28] and forward flux sampling [29] are more tolerant of uncertainty in the order parameter(s), but these are extremely computationally expensive to implement for large proteins with multiple intermediates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%