2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying petrophysical properties of micritic limestones using machine learning methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The XGB model, an advanced tree boosting system presented by Chen and Guestrin, 35 was confirmed to be a perfect machine-learning model for learning tabular datasets. 31,[36][37][38] It uses many additive functions f k to represent the relationship between the vector of input features X i and the output target y i of ith measurement as…”
Section: The Chosen Xgboost Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The XGB model, an advanced tree boosting system presented by Chen and Guestrin, 35 was confirmed to be a perfect machine-learning model for learning tabular datasets. 31,[36][37][38] It uses many additive functions f k to represent the relationship between the vector of input features X i and the output target y i of ith measurement as…”
Section: The Chosen Xgboost Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 XGBoost model is considered for the present study because it was confirmed to outperform other advanced machine-learning models for different types of tabular datasets. 31,[36][37][38] Also, the main objective of this study is not to repeat a comparison between different machine-learning tools but it focuses more on the data treatment strategy. More precisely, we aim to demonstrate that adding more low-cost and measurable features to the initial dataset would significantly improve the accuracy of the machine-learning model.…”
Section: The Chosen Xgboost Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yan et al applied XGBoost to well logging interpretation of tight sandstone and found that it performed better for fluid identification than the SVM and RF models [27]. Nguyen et al used XGBoost for predicting compressional and shear waves in micritic limestones and achieved higher accuracy than an artificial neural network (ANN) and SVM [42]. Gu et al used a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to determine the hyperparameters of the XGBoost algorithm and applied XGBoost to predict the permeability of tight sandstone [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%