2009
DOI: 10.1149/1.3021008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying on the Point-Defect-Conductive Property of the Semiconducting Anodic Oxide Films on Titanium

Abstract: By using electrochemical measurement techniques and based on the point-defect model ͑PDM͒, this work studied the point-defectconductive property of the n-type semiconducting anodic oxide film formed on titanium under steady-state condition within the passive potential region of ca. 0-7 V in 1.0 M HClO 4 solution. The point-defect transport property was characterized by the steady-state current density ͑i ss ͒ through the film and the diffusion coefficient ͑D O ͒ of the point defects in the film. It was demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average field strength in the case of static state, e, can be obtained from the slope of the E ff -L ss linear plot (see Fig. 6a), and the fitted slope is approximately 8.310 Â 10 6 V/cm, which is close to the field strength previously reported [31][32][33]. By analogy, the e value obtained in the case of ultrasonic cavitation with the powers of 180 W, 270 W and 450 W are taken to be 6.201 Â 10 6 V/cm, 7.331 Â 10 6 V/cm, 2.239 Â 10 6 V/cm, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasonic Cavitation Power On Diffusivitysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The average field strength in the case of static state, e, can be obtained from the slope of the E ff -L ss linear plot (see Fig. 6a), and the fitted slope is approximately 8.310 Â 10 6 V/cm, which is close to the field strength previously reported [31][32][33]. By analogy, the e value obtained in the case of ultrasonic cavitation with the powers of 180 W, 270 W and 450 W are taken to be 6.201 Â 10 6 V/cm, 7.331 Â 10 6 V/cm, 2.239 Â 10 6 V/cm, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasonic Cavitation Power On Diffusivitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…(3) to calculate the diffusivity of the point defect in the passive film, which is presented in Table 2. It shows that the order of magnitude of D 0 in the case of static state ranges from 10 À17 cm 2 s À1 to 10 À18 cm 2 s À1 , which is comparable to those of point defects in passive films on Fe in a pH 8.5 buffer solution [45], and similar to those of point defects in the oxide film on Ti in a 1 M HClO 4 solution [31]. However, D 0 rapidly arises with the increment of the ultrasonic cavitation power, and D 0 increases three to four orders of magnitude by applying the ultrasonic cavitation power of 450 W. The variations of D 0 and the film formation potential/ultrasonic cavitation power are list in Table 2, it can be seen that D 0 increases with the increment of the formation potential and sharply increases with increasing ultrasonic cavitation power.…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasonic Cavitation Power On Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…therein) and very recently it has been observed also on amorphous TiO 2 film grown on dif ferent single grains of pure (99.9%) titanium [29]. The frequency dependence of the capacitance is reflected in Mott-Schottky plots usually showing both donor density and flat band potential values frequency dependent [4,[29][30][31][32]. When this occurs for crystalline semiconductor/electrolyte junctions several physical explanations have been suggested in the literature as possible source of this dependence [33][34][35][36] [5,[16][17][18]37] that frequency dependent differential admittance val ues are theoretically expected for amorphous semi conductor passive film/electrolyte junction in agree ment with the theory of amorphous semiconductor Schottky barriers.…”
Section: Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (Eis)mentioning
confidence: 86%