2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying neighborhood crime across different macro spatial scales: The case of robbery in 4 cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodological concerns about spatial scale have been of lasting importance to geographers and some criminologists (see Brenner, 2001;Gehlke & Biehl, 1934;Openshaw, 1984;Smith, 1992;Smith & Dennis, 1987), and have more recently developed a much larger presence in criminological research (Hipp, 2007;Hipp & Boessen, 2013;Hipp et al, 2012;Hipp et al, 2017;Weisburd et al, 2009). Scale is thought of as a container for sociospatial activity.…”
Section: Methodological Contributions and Considerations: Uniting Criminology And Critical Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodological concerns about spatial scale have been of lasting importance to geographers and some criminologists (see Brenner, 2001;Gehlke & Biehl, 1934;Openshaw, 1984;Smith, 1992;Smith & Dennis, 1987), and have more recently developed a much larger presence in criminological research (Hipp, 2007;Hipp & Boessen, 2013;Hipp et al, 2012;Hipp et al, 2017;Weisburd et al, 2009). Scale is thought of as a container for sociospatial activity.…”
Section: Methodological Contributions and Considerations: Uniting Criminology And Critical Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andresen and Malleson (2011) similarly found much more longitudinal stability in violent crime patterns at the street segment level than at dissemination areas (similar to census block groups) or census tracts in Vancouver. Still, street segments alone do not explain the distribution of crime, and so understanding concentration and stability at the neighborhood or community level is also important for explaining crime patterns (see Hipp et al, 2017; Jones & Pridemore, 2019).…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquor stores are related to increased crime rates where for instance, streets containing bars and pubs experienced more crime than streets lacking them (McCord et al, 2007;Rengert et al, 2005;Roncek & Bell, 1981;Roncek & Maier, 1991). Retail stores have also been found to be related to elevated crime levels in varying scales (Bernasco and Block 2011;Boessen and Hipp, 2015;Hipp et al (2017). Transit-related land uses have also been associated with increased risk of crime with subway stations attracting crime and influencing the distribution of criminal activity.…”
Section: Geographical Juxtaposition and Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have been found to be related to increased crime rates where for instance, streets containing bars and pubs experienced more crime than streets lacking them (McCord et al, 2007;Rengert et al, 2005;Roncek & Bell, 1981;Roncek & Maier, 1991). Other land uses e.g., transit-related land-uses, retail stores, schools, lack of use of land e.t.c have also been related to crime (Roncek and Faggiani, 1985;Roncek & LoBosco, 1983;Roncek and Faggiani, 1985;Wilcox et al, 2004;Bernasco & Block, 2011;Boessen & Hipp, 2015;Hipp et al, 2017;). It was apparent that the relationship between land-uses and crime is far more complex as pointed out by Cozens et al (2019).…”
Section: Bars and Pubsmentioning
confidence: 99%