2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying low-literate consumers through experimental methods: Implications for subsistence marketplaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experiments commonly use university staff as participants (Gau et al, 2012). Random assignment placed subjects in one of eight experimental conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments commonly use university staff as participants (Gau et al, 2012). Random assignment placed subjects in one of eight experimental conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low‐literate consumers' preferences for concrete and pictographic thinking as well as their poor reading skills (Gau et al ., ) were considered during question and scale development, accompanied by realistic and colourful visual presentations on show cards (Townsend et al ., ). Three‐point Likert scales (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The researchers chose to take an experimental approach so that we could observe behaviour and identify causality (Charness, Gneezy and Kuhn, 2012). Gau, Jae and Viswanathan (2012) suggest that this approach is appropriate for research among low-literate consumers. Based on the place of execution, Sekaran (2003) divided experimental design into two types: lab experiments and field experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Involving low-literate consumers in our study was a challenge because we must devote attention to several issues, as stated by Gau, Jae and Viswanathan (2012). We eliminated reading and writing tasks by delivering our presentation using PowerPoint slides with audio (Study 1) and video (Study 2); all writing tasks are performed by an assistant; we simplified terms and used daily language (e.g.,the common word "obat" was employed in the presentation to mean "pesticide" whereas although its true meaning is "medicine"); we used visual scales for the evaluation task and we chose local people who can speak the local language as experiment assistants to make our participants comfortable, to encourage more to come and to prevent anxiety.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%