2017
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2015.604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studying DDT Susceptibility at Discriminating Time Intervals Focusing on Maximum Limit of Exposure Time Survived by DDT Resistant <i>Phlebotomus argentipes</i> (Diptera: Psychodidae): an Investigative Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(9 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, DDT being an insecticide of choice since 1977, it has been exploited extensively for controlling P. argentipes [45,46] that it became resistant against it and instead of being killed, it manipulated its behaviour from endophilic to exophilic nature [47]. Another remarkable point is that DDT itself fails to hold efficacy for longer duration, resulting in increased lethal time (upto 420 minutes) making it non-effective for killing indian VL vector [21]. Besides these factors, operational facets incorporated by logistic problems [19,20] configures decreasing susceptibility or increasing resistance among P. argentipes [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here, DDT being an insecticide of choice since 1977, it has been exploited extensively for controlling P. argentipes [45,46] that it became resistant against it and instead of being killed, it manipulated its behaviour from endophilic to exophilic nature [47]. Another remarkable point is that DDT itself fails to hold efficacy for longer duration, resulting in increased lethal time (upto 420 minutes) making it non-effective for killing indian VL vector [21]. Besides these factors, operational facets incorporated by logistic problems [19,20] configures decreasing susceptibility or increasing resistance among P. argentipes [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another remarkable point is that DDT itself fails to hold efficacy for longer duration, resulting in increased lethal time (upto 420 minutes) making it non-effective for killing indian VL vector [21]. Besides these factors, operational facets incorporated by logistic problems [19,20] configures decreasing susceptibility or increasing resistance among P. argentipes [21]. In that situation, contaminating vector population by maintaining IRS becomes 'insignificant', 'exhaustive', 'time-taking' and 'cost-defective' as it always demands repetition for avoiding instances of 'zero-efficacy'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, remained highlighted as a first line VL vector control chemical option since 1953 [10,11]. After the decades of extensive application of DDT, P. argentipes had attained tolerance/ resistance against it [12,13] which is continuing till date [14,15,16,17]. Due to this, flaring-up of VL cases with diminishing effect of DDT spray was observed [11] that supported the non-decrement in vectorial population too (Kumar et al Personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%