2020
DOI: 10.1038/d41586-020-02596-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study the role of hubris in nations’ COVID-19 response

Abstract: Many countries that see themselves as distinctive have handled the pandemic badly.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 42 )--or even acknowledge the risks associated with the pandemic in their home country (e.g., ref. 43 ). Therefore, in identifying associations with compliance with public health measures, we sought to distinguish NI from NN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 42 )--or even acknowledge the risks associated with the pandemic in their home country (e.g., ref. 43 ). Therefore, in identifying associations with compliance with public health measures, we sought to distinguish NI from NN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this study's timeframe, the United States led the world in cases and deaths despite its pre-pandemic ranking as the country best equipped to manage a pandemic such as COVID-19 (Cameron et al, 2019). These public-health outcomes occurred against a backdrop of disinformation and failures of national leadership (Evanega et al, 2020;Ball and Maxmen, 2020;Holtz et al, 2020;Lincoln, 2020;Thorp, 2020). Lack of national leadership was observed in the relative dearth of national-level public-health policies and guidance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This understanding of health security as a ‘state of exception’, framed too by the broader contexts as described in previous reports [ 1 ], could explain why much of the literature reviewed focused on acute infectious disease or biohazards. This also may explain inadequate COVID-19 readiness and response, particularly in HICs, where notions of health security took the form of a ‘once in a century’ exceptionalism, with the assumption that threats would mostly affect the Global South and that HICs capacities were sufficiently prepared, creating a condition of complacency [ 111 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%