2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.094034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study the molecular nature of σ , f0(980) , and a0

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as found in Ref. [68], for the bound state of the KK channel, one should decrease the cutoff to move the pole of the f 0 (980) state to higher energy when the ηη channel is included, which will lead to the width of the pole decrease, see the solid (red) line of Fig. 7 and more discussions in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, as found in Ref. [68], for the bound state of the KK channel, one should decrease the cutoff to move the pole of the f 0 (980) state to higher energy when the ηη channel is included, which will lead to the width of the pole decrease, see the solid (red) line of Fig. 7 and more discussions in Ref.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…7 and more discussions in Ref. [68]. This is why the peak of the f 0 (980) state become narrow when we add the coupled channel of ηη, which is different from the interference effects in the case of narrow σ state in the J/ψ → ppπ + π − decay [87] and the J/ψ → ωππ decay [88].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where m 1 and m 2 are the masses of the two mesons involved in the loop of the ith channel, and P is the four-momentum of the two mesons. The function G i is logarithmically divergent, there are two methods to solve this singular integral, either using the three-momentum cut-off method [10,12,29], or the dimensional regularization method [33,[35][36][37][38][39]. The choice of a particular regularization scheme does not, of course, affect our argumentation [33,34].…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%