2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3881-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study protocol of the multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the Frankfurt Early Intervention Programme A-FFIP versus early intervention as usual for toddlers and preschool children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (A-FFIP study)

Abstract: Background: Naturalistic developmental behavioural interventions (NDBI) have been shown to improve autismspecific symptoms in young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). NDBI approaches, such as the ASDspecific Frankfurt Early Intervention Programme for ASD (A-FFIP), are based on ASD-specific developmental and learning aspects. A-FFIP is a low-intensity intervention which can easily be implemented in the local health care/ social welfare system. The aim of the present study is to establish 1-year effic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recruitment strategy included contacting families that were on the wait list for therapy at the Frankfurt Autism Intervention and Research Center of Excellence, local advertisement in kindergartens, social media and health system institutions. The assessment of ASD participants was part of the baseline measurement of a randomized controlled trial (Kitzerow et al, 2020) that received ethical coverage from the local ethics committee (10/18). TD assessments received another ethical coverage (361/18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recruitment strategy included contacting families that were on the wait list for therapy at the Frankfurt Autism Intervention and Research Center of Excellence, local advertisement in kindergartens, social media and health system institutions. The assessment of ASD participants was part of the baseline measurement of a randomized controlled trial (Kitzerow et al, 2020) that received ethical coverage from the local ethics committee (10/18). TD assessments received another ethical coverage (361/18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria of ASD participants were based on the study protocol by Kitzerow et al (2020). TD participants were excluded if they showed at least one scale of the German version of the Child Behavior Checklist 1 ½–5 (Achenbach, 2013) in clinical ranges ( T > 65) or a T ‐score >75 in the German version of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; Bölte et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early intervention has a significant impact on ASD patient’s progress and improvement [ 24 , 25 ]. Although The American Academy of Pediatrics recommended routine screening of ASD for children aged from 18 months to 24 months, few centres or even countries follow this screening routine [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this manuscript, we use an initial selection of a subset of datasets selected for inclusion in R2D2-MH. These datasets included the EU-AIMS Longitudinal European Autism Project (LEAP) 57 , The Preschool Brain Imaging and Behaviour Project (PIP) https://www.aims-2-trials.eu/pip/, Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Neurodevelopmental Impairment in Preterm Infants (ePRIME) 63 , the SOSTA-net Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) 64 , the ASD-speci c Frankfurt Early Intervention Programme for ASD RCT (A-FFIP) 65 , the Neurobiology and Treatment of Adolescent Female Conduct Disorder (FemNat-CD) 66 and the developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) 67 . The datasets cover a broad range of cohorts in neurodevelopmental conditions and mental health, including diagnoses of autism, ADHD, intellectual disability, developmental delay, epilepsy, and conduct disorders, with ages ranging from infants born preterm to adults.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%