Iclem 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1061/41139(387)406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Vital Node of Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. So the reentrant lattice SS discussed in 43,50,51 is different from the bulk 4 He SS state discussed in this paper, although both kinds of supersolids share some interesting common properties. In both cases, the SF to SS transition is driven by the closing of the gap of the roton minimum, so the transition could be first or second order at mean field level.…”
Section: Appendix B: Comparisons With Supersolids On Latticesmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6. So the reentrant lattice SS discussed in 43,50,51 is different from the bulk 4 He SS state discussed in this paper, although both kinds of supersolids share some interesting common properties. In both cases, the SF to SS transition is driven by the closing of the gap of the roton minimum, so the transition could be first or second order at mean field level.…”
Section: Appendix B: Comparisons With Supersolids On Latticesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…So the theory developed in this paper on bulk 4 He is different from the lattice theory developed in 43,50 . As shown in the appendix A and in 50,51 , one common fact of both supersolids is that both are due to vacancies or interstitials. Lattice supersolids can also be described by doping the adjacent CDW either by vacancies or interstitials, so are classified as two types SS − v and SS − i.…”
Section: Appendix B: Comparisons With Supersolids On Latticesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations