2000
DOI: 10.1021/ma001142g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Thermodynamic Interactions between Isotactic Polypropylene and Ethylene−1-Hexene Random Copolymers by SANS

Abstract: The miscibility of perdeuterated isotactic polypropylene (d-PP) and ethylene-1-hexene random copolymer (EHR) blends, which were polymerized by metallocene catalyst, was investigated by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) with changing hexene content in EHR and temperature above the melting point of d-PP. Flory-Huggins interaction parameter (χ d-PP/EHR) between two polymers was determined on the basis of random phase approximation (RPA). It was revealed that χd-PP/EHR decreases with increasing hexene content … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained R g,H = 49.5 Å for the hydrogenated iPP and a small χ DH value (<10 -4 ) by applying a least-mean-square method as a fitting procedure. The ratio of R g to M w 1/2 ( R g / M w 1/2 ) obtained in this experiment is 0.40 and is almost consistent with the value obtained from iPP (0.37−0.40) with narrow molecular weight distribution ( M w / M n ∼ 1.7) previously reported by other authors. , The very small χ DH value means that d-iPP and h-iPP can be recognized as equivalent species, as is also already reported. ,
1 SANS profile for a d-iPP/h-iPP (50:50) blend at 190 °C (□) and its fitting results (bold line) with eq 2.
2 SANS intensities obtained from d-iPP/a(P/B) (P/B = 60:40) blend at 190 °C and their fitting results with eq 2.
3 SANS profiles for three d-iPP/a(P/B) blends at various temperatures. a(P/B) materials are aPP (A), a(P/B) (P/B = 60:40) (B), and aPB (C).
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We obtained R g,H = 49.5 Å for the hydrogenated iPP and a small χ DH value (<10 -4 ) by applying a least-mean-square method as a fitting procedure. The ratio of R g to M w 1/2 ( R g / M w 1/2 ) obtained in this experiment is 0.40 and is almost consistent with the value obtained from iPP (0.37−0.40) with narrow molecular weight distribution ( M w / M n ∼ 1.7) previously reported by other authors. , The very small χ DH value means that d-iPP and h-iPP can be recognized as equivalent species, as is also already reported. ,
1 SANS profile for a d-iPP/h-iPP (50:50) blend at 190 °C (□) and its fitting results (bold line) with eq 2.
2 SANS intensities obtained from d-iPP/a(P/B) (P/B = 60:40) blend at 190 °C and their fitting results with eq 2.
3 SANS profiles for three d-iPP/a(P/B) blends at various temperatures. a(P/B) materials are aPP (A), a(P/B) (P/B = 60:40) (B), and aPB (C).
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is well-known that miscibility control of polyolefin polymer blends is very important for both industrial applications and its inherent scientific interest. To understand the miscibility between polyolefins, many researchers have performed various experiments such as morphology observation by TEM, observation of phase diagrams by small-angle light scattering (SALS), , and estimation of χ by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), pressure−volume−temperature diagrams (PVT), solubility parameters, , etc. Among them, SANS is one of the most powerful experiments which can quantitatively estimate the degree of miscibility between polyolefins, and many SANS studies for polyolefin blend systems have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result suggests that the contributions of the SCBs in mLLDPE and the LCBs in LDPE to the values of their blends are negligible, as reported elsewhere (Alamo et al, 1997). Note that the determined values are significantly lower than the theoretical ones at the spinodal point ( sp ) given by the following equation (Seki, 2000):…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A primary difficulty in experimentally assessing the phase behavior of polyolefin blends, especially at melt process temperatures, is the similarity in chemical structure of the blend constituents. The most rigorous studies have relied on extrapolation of results with model copolymers to predict the phase behavior of real polymers 4–8. However, in a recent review of binary blends of high‐density polyethylene with low‐density polyethylenes of different chain microstructure, Zhao and Choi9 noted that the effects of branch content, molecular weight averages, molecular weight distribution, and branch length are still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%