Solution Behavior of Surfactants 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3491-0_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Micelle Formation of Sodium Deoxycholate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of 2.89 mM was obtained for the cmc from fluorescence intensities of 2-(4‘-piridil)bencimidazol (see Figure ). The value is in the range of most published values at 0.1−0.2 M Na + (2 to 3 mM 13f,, ).
2 Critical micelle concentration determination for NaDC at 20 °C by fluorescence of 2-(4‘-piridil)bencimidazol at 380 nm.
…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A value of 2.89 mM was obtained for the cmc from fluorescence intensities of 2-(4‘-piridil)bencimidazol (see Figure ). The value is in the range of most published values at 0.1−0.2 M Na + (2 to 3 mM 13f,, ).
2 Critical micelle concentration determination for NaDC at 20 °C by fluorescence of 2-(4‘-piridil)bencimidazol at 380 nm.
…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Here we present the experimental results for the aggregation kinetics obtained from static light scattering measurements. Although static light scattering has been extensively used to measure physicochemical properties of bile salt−aqueous solutions systems, , it has not been applied to study the NaDC gelation process. It is also important that it is not an invasive technique and that the system remains unperturbed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most papers in Figure 1 and Table 1, the reported values of N pertain to those at the CMC, but in a few reports the values refer to some concentrations above the CMC (39, 44, 49) (points b, g and 1). In several papers, pH of solutions was not indicated nor was it controlled (43,44,47,48) (points f, g, j, k). The temperature effects on N cannot explain the discrepancies in Figure 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here it should be noted that when some dif-ferent types of aggregates are formed by protonated SMDP molecules, the aggregates can gather together to form a bigger aggregate, or a huge molecular assembly, depending on the situation given. These aggregates can be formed and become large even in very lower concentration range, as has been observed for aqueous solution of sodium deoxycholate having two hydroxyl groups and a carboxyl group (22)(23)(24)(25) . Such large size aggregates composed of many protonated SMDP molecules can be suspended (dispersed) in bulk solution.…”
Section: Aggregates Formation Suggested By Ph and Light Scattering mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A similar situation is shown below with respect to the concentration dependence in pH. In the case of a bile salt, sodium deoxycholate being a surfactant present in living bodies, the molecules are highly polymerized through hydrogen bonding to form huge aggregates below CMC, or result in gelation throughout the solution (22)(23)(24)(25). Similar to the case of the bile salt, a large aggregate may be transformed into smaller aggregates again by further increased concentration; the frown huge particles or polymerized fibril aggregates which are regarded as being in a state between dissolution and precipitation can be solubilized by the further added surfactant.…”
Section: Aggregates Formation Suggested By Ph and Light Scattering mentioning
confidence: 73%