Study on the influence of water injection pressure on water absorption process and water injection effect of coal

Abstract

Rock burst disasters can be reduced and prevented with the help of coal dust water injection. In this study, the high‐pressure water injection device is used to examine how the water absorption rate changes over time under various water injection pressures. The results reveal that the water absorption rate of coal samples increases quickly initially before slowing down with water absorption time. Its change can be described using the Langmuir equation. In addition, the Langmuir equation is utilized to demonstrate how water injection pressure affects the maximum water absorption of coal samples. The effects of experimental findings and numerical analysis are investigated on water injection pressure. The breadth and extent of coal bodies with increased moisture are continuously expanding at the same water injection pressure and water injection time. The water absorption of coal close to the borehole remains relatively unchanged with an increase in water injection pressure, but the water absorption range of coal in the vicinity increases. Therefore, raising the water injection pressure and duration will improve the effective range of water injection. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Experimental Study on the Relationship Among Complex Resistivity, Water Saturation, and Salinity in the Jiaozuo Anthracite Reservoir

“…Coal is a dual medium containing cracks and pores, which serve as channels for the storage and transportation of solutions. 23 When a coal sample is immersed in a sodium chloride solution, the solution initially fills the holes and cracks. In the absence of an applied electric field, no electrical properties are observed.…”

Heat–fluid–solid-coupled model of flue gas displacement CH 4 in coal seams and application

“…By substituting Equations ( 9) and (10) into Equation (8), we can obtain the governing equation (13) for the migration of the various gases in the cracks:…”

“…Zhang [11] , Wang [12] , and Yang [13] found that the gas flooding technology for CH4 extraction is more feasible in principle and effect than single-gas injection through a field application of single-gas injection to displace coal seam gas. Jia [14] , He [15] , and Fan [16] concluded that N2-ECBM and CO2-ECBM can significantly improve the CH4 extraction rate through a numerical simulation of single-gas flooding of a CH4-containing coal seam.…”