2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00235-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the fuzzy ranking of granite sawability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to (14), the positive and negative ideal solutions are as follows: + = {0.1386, 0.0274, 0.0849, 0.1703} , + = {0.0593, 0.0178, 0.0314, 0.0645} .…”
Section: Ranking the Sawabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to (14), the positive and negative ideal solutions are as follows: + = {0.1386, 0.0274, 0.0849, 0.1703} , + = {0.0593, 0.0178, 0.0314, 0.0645} .…”
Section: Ranking the Sawabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influences of cutting speed and depth of cut on segment wear were studied [13]. Segment wear and cutting force can be evaluated based on rock properties [14]. Shore scleroscope hardness, water absorption, and cone indenter hardness had a greater effect on segment wear than other rock properties [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, many studies have been done on the relations between sawability and rock characteristics in stone processing (Burgess, 1978;Wright & Cassapi, 1985;Birle & Ratterman, 1986;Jennings & Wright, 1989;Clausen et al, 1996;Tonshoff et al, 2002;Eyuboglu et al, 2003;Wei et al, 2003;Ersoy & Atici, 2004;Gunaydin et al, 2004;Kahraman et al, 2004;Özçelik et al, 2004;Delgado et al, 2005;Ersoy et al, 2005;Buyuksagis & Goktan, 2005;Kahraman et al, 2006;Fener et al, 2007;Tutmez et al, 2007;Özçelik, 2007;Buyuksagis, 2007;Kahraman et al, 2007;Mikaeil et al, 2008Mikaeil et al, , 2011aMikaeil et al, -c, 2012Mikaeil et al, , 2013aKrauze et al, 2009;Atici & Ersoy, 2009;Ataei et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, among the previous studies some researchers have developed a number of classification systems for ranking the sawability of rocks. Wei et al (2003) evaluated and classified the sawability of granites by means of the fuzzy ranking system. In their study, wear performance of the blade and the cutting force were used as the sawability criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%