2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/ccc52363.2021.9550628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Effect of High Temperature and High-Current Rate on Fast Charging of Lithium-ion Batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that after 800 cycles, the cells lost 36% of their initial capacity at 45 • C. The results also showed that cells cycled at 55 • C lost more than 70% of their initial capacity after 600 cycles. Experimentation was conducted in a lithium-ion battery at high temperatures and current rates in [19]. It was reported that the experimental data obtained from charging the battery at 6C to the designated capacity showed a 240-s charging time improvement (580 s vs. 820 s) at 55 • C, compared with 25 • C. This result might indicate that the charging time of the battery improves when the temperature rises; however, internal battery degradation is not reported, which is a significant omission.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that after 800 cycles, the cells lost 36% of their initial capacity at 45 • C. The results also showed that cells cycled at 55 • C lost more than 70% of their initial capacity after 600 cycles. Experimentation was conducted in a lithium-ion battery at high temperatures and current rates in [19]. It was reported that the experimental data obtained from charging the battery at 6C to the designated capacity showed a 240-s charging time improvement (580 s vs. 820 s) at 55 • C, compared with 25 • C. This result might indicate that the charging time of the battery improves when the temperature rises; however, internal battery degradation is not reported, which is a significant omission.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%