Study on the Comparison of the Difference of Reaching Between the Real and the Virtual Environment Using HMD

Hiramoto, Kazuki; Hamamoto, Kazuhiko

doi:10.1109/ibiomed.2018.8534857

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The effect is however present on non-stereoscopic screens (Makaremi and N'Kaoua (2021); Popp et al (2004)), stereoscopic screens (Lin and Woldegiorgis (2017); Woldegiorgis and Lin (2017)) CAVEs (Piryankova et al (2013);Hofmann et al (2001)) and HMDs (Bodenheimer et al (2007); Gamberini et al (2008); Geuss et al (2012); Hiramoto and Hamamoto (2018); Napieralski et al (2011)). A comparison of older and more recent HMDs indicates a reduction of that effect on newer devices (Kelly et al (2017)), possibly as a consequence of increased display resolution and visual information (Ryu et al (2005)).…”

Section: Distance Perceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ecological validity of virtual reality simulations in workstation health and safety assessment

Personeni

Savescu

2023

Front. Virtual Real.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The last decade saw a rapid rise of interest in Virtual Reality (VR) technologies, driven by more mature hardware and software tools. Within the ongoing digitalization of industry, VR technologies see uses in workstation design, operator training and tele-operation. This article focuses on how VR can contribute to workstation design including health and safety assessment. VR allows the inclusion of the operator in the workstation design process, permitting evaluation of the design in a safe, interactive and immersive virtual environment. This systematic literature review aims to qualify the ecological validity of VR tools and identify the current obstacles to safe and successful workstation design transfer. A standard systematic literature review procedure is used, on a wide selection of experimental research articles studying the validity of VR, within or outside of industrial contexts. We aggregate results from fundamental research on VR ecological validity regarding user perceptions, movement, cognition and stress. These results are discussed with respect to their influence on workstation OSH assessment in VR. Furthermore, we identify current technological factors and upcoming developments that mediate the validity of VR assessments.

show abstract