2019
DOI: 10.29252/jafm.12.05.29705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on the Accuracy of RANS Modelling of the Turbulent Flow Developed in a Kaplan Turbine Operated at BEP. Part 2 - Pressure Fluctuations

Abstract: The aim of the paper is to investigate the limitations of unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of the flow in an axial turbine. The study is focused on modelling the pressure pulsations monitored on the runner blades. The scanned blade geometry renders the meshing process more difficult. As the pressure monitor points are defined on the blade surface the simulation relies on the wall functions to capture the flow and the pressure oscillations. In addition to the classical turbulence mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of prediction and simulation, high-precision numerical simulation methods such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are widely utilized to predict pressure pulsations, including Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and models based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS). Among them, RANSbased models have limitations in predicting pressure fluctuations [5], while LES and DNS are especially suitable for the study of pressure fluctuations due to their high accuracy in simulating turbulence and complex flow structures. However, these two methods usually require higher computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of prediction and simulation, high-precision numerical simulation methods such as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) are widely utilized to predict pressure pulsations, including Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and models based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS). Among them, RANSbased models have limitations in predicting pressure fluctuations [5], while LES and DNS are especially suitable for the study of pressure fluctuations due to their high accuracy in simulating turbulence and complex flow structures. However, these two methods usually require higher computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e typical structure of Kaplan turbines is shown in Figure 1. e excitation forces of Kaplan turbine runners can be both static and dynamic pressures [10][11][12][13][14][15]. e dynamic pressure mostly comes from the rotor-stator interaction (RSI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that both captured the tip vortex, hub vortices, blades' wakes, and on‐axis structure, and also showed that the dynamics of tip runner vortices is affected by the rotation and shroud boundary layer. Based on flow simulations in the same Kaplan turbine model, Iovănel discussed the advantages and limitations of RANS and URANS modeling, while several turbulence models were used. Most of the researches focused on the pressure fluctuations caused by RSI and the torque fluctuation and vibration induced by the asymmetric pressure loadings were of great concern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%