2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on temporal and spectral behaviour of 3C 279 during 2018 January flare

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, θ j is the jet opening angle, and it is related to jet Lorentz factor through the relation θ j Γ j ~ 0.2 as suggested 38 . Thus, we conclude that the gamma-ray flare region lies outside of the BLR in 3C 279 in agreement with other recent studies 26 , 32 , 39 – 41 . Figure 2 b shows a schematic diagram of the envisaged scenario: The minute-scale-flares superimposed on the more slowly varying envelope emission result from the magnetic reconnection of multiple twisted flux ropes in a turbulent, filamentary region where the magnetically dominated jet becomes unstable to the kink instability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Here, θ j is the jet opening angle, and it is related to jet Lorentz factor through the relation θ j Γ j ~ 0.2 as suggested 38 . Thus, we conclude that the gamma-ray flare region lies outside of the BLR in 3C 279 in agreement with other recent studies 26 , 32 , 39 – 41 . Figure 2 b shows a schematic diagram of the envisaged scenario: The minute-scale-flares superimposed on the more slowly varying envelope emission result from the magnetic reconnection of multiple twisted flux ropes in a turbulent, filamentary region where the magnetically dominated jet becomes unstable to the kink instability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The model parameter space obtained in the present study is broadly consistent with the previous values in the literature (Sahayanathan et al 2018;Hayashida et al 2015;Sahayanathan & Godambe 2012). Recently, Shah et al (2019) have studied the flaring episode of 3C 279 observed in January 2018 and report that the increase in the value of Γ causes flux enhancement during the outburst.…”
Section: Spectral Energy Distribution Modellingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The best fit results suggest that there is no significant variation in the bulk Lorentz factor Γ during different flux states. However, it can be noted that the obtained Γ values are lesser compared to the typical value as observed in other FSRQs (Shah et al 2017(Shah et al , 2019. Since the source parameters obtained through the spectral fit depend on the equipartition condition and other frozen quantities, relaxing these assumptions can result in larger Γ.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r) and the correlation probability (P) have been found as -0.07 and 0.66 for the correlation between F0.1−300GeV and α, -0.33 and 0.33 between F0.1−300GeV and β during F1 state; while for F2 state, the r and P values are 0.10 and 0.39 for correlation between F0.1−300GeV and α, and -0.24 and 0.04 between F0.1−300GeV and β, respectively. The obtained results suggest that there is no correlation between these parameters or no 'harder when brighter' trend is observed for the source, which is witnessed in most of the blazars (Shah et al 2019;Khatoon et al 2020;Prince 2020). However, recently Prince et al 2021 found that the FSRQ OQ 334 has also not shown spectral hardening behavior with 12 hr binned gamma-ray flux.…”
Section: Spectral Variationmentioning
confidence: 82%