2007
DOI: 10.1252/kakoronbunshu.33.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Tangential Velocity Distribution for Radial Direction in a Fully Turbulent Agitated Vessel without Baffles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequential 1000 frames were analyzed statistically to evaluate the liquid motion, and the sampling interval was 0.005 seconds because the reproducible flow pattern was obtained from the same test conditions. [ 36 ] The experimental conditions for the PIV measurement are also shown in Table 3. The variables were blade angle and rotation speed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sequential 1000 frames were analyzed statistically to evaluate the liquid motion, and the sampling interval was 0.005 seconds because the reproducible flow pattern was obtained from the same test conditions. [ 36 ] The experimental conditions for the PIV measurement are also shown in Table 3. The variables were blade angle and rotation speed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acrylic hemispherical vessel with an inner diameter of T (m) without baffles was surrounded by an acrylic cuboid vessel filled with tap water to decrease the optical refraction index. [33][34][35][36] Liquid was charged into the hemispherical vessel in order to become bath depth, H L (m) = (3/5)T. The off-bottom clearance, C (m), was defined as the distance between the impeller and vessel bottom. The shaft centre of the impeller was set on the central axis of the hemispherical vessel and the up-pumping impeller was used in this study.…”
Section: Visual Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When m = 1.9 was used instead of 1.7, the profile of u ++ came into good agreement, as shown in Figure 5. Shiobara et al 45 showed that the parameter m can be expressed using the radius of a cylindrically rotating zone as = m r r 2.5( / ) c d 2 (10) They used the correlation equation of power consumption by Kamei et al 46 to calculate r c for paddle impellers having different configurations in their paper. This overestimation may come from the definition of m. As Tamburini et al 47 pointed out, at very large Re d , eddy−viscosity models including the SST k−ω model slightly overestimate the power consumption of the impeller due to the turbulence anisotropy.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When m = 1.9 was used instead of 1.7, the profile of u ++ came into good agreement, as shown in Figure . Shiobara et al showed that the parameter m can be expressed using the radius of a cylindrically rotating zone as They used the correlation equation of power consumption by Kamei et al to calculate r c for paddle impellers having different configurations in their paper. This overestimation may come from the definition of m .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%