Study on Standardization of Korean Version of Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire : The Optimal Cutoff Scores

Kwak, Jae Hoon; Kim, Jung Bum; Choi, Jeong Shik; Kim, Hee Cheol; Jung, Sung Won; Lee, Eun Jung; Sung, Hyung Mo; Sakong, Jung Kyu; Shin, Im Hee; Jung, Chul Ho

doi:10.4306/jknpa.2012.51.2.77

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The cut-off score is a significant indicator for evaluating scale accuracy in screening measurements. A cut-off value might be calculated to increase sensitivity [ 40 ]. It is appropriate to select cut-off values for both high sensitivity and specificity.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Clinical reasoning is a vital competency for healthcare providers. In 2014, a clinical reasoning assessment rubric (CRAR) composed of analysis, heuristics, inference, information processing, logic, cognition and meta-cognition subdomains was developed for osteopathy students. Methods This study was conducted to verify the validity and reliability of the CRAR in nursing education. A total of 202 case vignette assessments completed by 68 students were used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the CRAR was calculated. Results The content validity indices ranged from 0.57 to 1.0. The EFA resulted in three factors: assessment in nursing, nursing diagnosis and planning, and cognition/meta-cognition in nursing. The CFA supported a 3-factor model. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the CRAR was 0.94. This study confirmed the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the CRAR. Therefore, the CRAR is a useful rubric for assessing clinical reasoning in nursing students. Conclusions The CRAR is a standardized rubric for assessing clinical reasoning in nurses. This scale will be useful for the development of educational programs for improving clinical reasoning in nursing education.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We excluded the illiterate subjects and the self-surrendered subjects who had been lived in more than 1 year in South Korea. Of these 639 subjects, 545 completed the Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination scale (PDD), 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 the Korean version of Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (K-PDSQ), 13 , 14 and sociodemographic questionnaires an overall response rate of 85.3%. Two physicians with more than 6 months of experience of treating North Korean defectors performed the interviews.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kwak et al reported an PDSQ optimal cutoff scores for ten types of psychiatric status, that is, major depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, alcohol-related problems, generalized anxiety disorder, hypochondriasis, and social phobia among the general population of South Korea. 14 We defined mental illness based on the presence of one of ten types.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stigma of Mental Illnesses as Perceived by North Korean Defectors Living in South Korea

Ahn

Kim

Choi

et al. 2015

Psychiatry Investig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis study aims to provide the information of the stigmas of mental illness such as psychosis, alcoholism, attempt suicide, and depression among North Korean defectors.MethodsWe examined stigma for the mental illnesses of 639 North Korean defectors aged 19 to 65 years who live in the Settlement Support Center for North Korean Refugees. The stigmas of mental illnesses were assessed using the Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale We directly compared the stigma level between North Korean defectors and the general population of South Korea.ResultsNorth Korean defectors had higher perceived stigmas of psychosis and alcoholism and lower perceived stigmas of depression than South Koreans. Perceived stigma associated with attempted suicide was similar for North Korean defectors and South Koreans. Only marital status in sociodemographic variables had associations with higher perceived stigma of psychosis, alcoholism, and depression in the North Korean defectors. North Korean defectors, who spent more than one year in transit country, had associations with lower perceived stigma of psychosis and alcoholism. North Korean defectors, who had the experience of compulsory repatriation to North Korea or North Korean family in South Korea, had an association with higher perceived stigma of depression.ConclusionNorth Korean defectors had higher perceived stigmas of psychosis and alcoholism and lower perceived stigmas of depression than South Koreans. Further studies are needed to document serial changes in stigmas for mental illnesses associated with the receipt of education at the Settlement Support Center for North Korean defectors.

show abstract

Comparison of the Impact of K-MOCA and BBS on MBI Using Cutoff Point and Score in Patients with Post-stroke Hemiplegia

Hyo-Lyun¹,

Kim²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study compared the impact of the level of cognitive function and balance on activities of daily living in patients with post stroke hemiplegia based on the cutoff point and score of the K MOCA, BBS, and MBI. Methods The scores and cutoff point of the Berg balance scale (BBS), Korean Montral Cognitive Assessment (K MOCA), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) were compared among 114 patients who had been diagnosed with stroke at least six months earlier.Results There were differences in the scores and cutoff point of K MOCA according to the affected side. Balance, level of cognitive function, and activities of daily living were found to be strongly correlated as shown by the comparison of total scores and cutoff scores. Conclusions When cutoff point are used, disability standards can be identified for Balance, level of cognitive function, and activities of daily living.

show abstract

Study on Standardization of Korean Version of Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire : The Optimal Cutoff Scores

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education

Psychometric properties of a clinical reasoning assessment rubric for nursing education

Stigma of Mental Illnesses as Perceived by North Korean Defectors Living in South Korea

Comparison of the Impact of K-MOCA and BBS on MBI Using Cutoff Point and Score in Patients with Post-stroke Hemiplegia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About