2013
DOI: 10.1080/23248378.2013.790138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on safety boundary for high-speed train running in severe environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“….8] < 50 ms) (Japanese National Railways (JNR)) (Yokose, 1966); (Wu and Wilson, 2006); (5) The bogie-side-sum L/V limit criterion ((L/V) B <0.6) (Wu and Wilson, 2006); (6) Prudhomme's criterion (transverse axle force) (F ys <10+P 0 /3, where P 0 is the static wheelset load) (Wilson et al, 2011); (7) The wheel load unloading ratio (V/V<0.8) (Jin et al, 2013); (8) The vehicle overturning coefficient (V D /V 0 < 0.8) (Jin et al, 2013); (9) The wheel rise (Z up ) limit with respect to the rail (Z up <28.272 mm) (Jin et al, 2013); (10) The lateral coordinate (y con ) limit of the wheel-rail contact point (−38.875 mm<y con <57.0 mm) (Jin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methods For Safety Assessment Of Crosswindsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….8] < 50 ms) (Japanese National Railways (JNR)) (Yokose, 1966); (Wu and Wilson, 2006); (5) The bogie-side-sum L/V limit criterion ((L/V) B <0.6) (Wu and Wilson, 2006); (6) Prudhomme's criterion (transverse axle force) (F ys <10+P 0 /3, where P 0 is the static wheelset load) (Wilson et al, 2011); (7) The wheel load unloading ratio (V/V<0.8) (Jin et al, 2013); (8) The vehicle overturning coefficient (V D /V 0 < 0.8) (Jin et al, 2013); (9) The wheel rise (Z up ) limit with respect to the rail (Z up <28.272 mm) (Jin et al, 2013); (10) The lateral coordinate (y con ) limit of the wheel-rail contact point (−38.875 mm<y con <57.0 mm) (Jin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methods For Safety Assessment Of Crosswindsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are mainly used for railway vehicle stability, comfort and safety assessment (Zhai et al, 2009). For a high-speed train, if the problems discussed in Section 1 are not included in the analysis, these models can also be used (Jin et al, 2013). However, in this case the interaction between the vehicles of the train is ignored.…”
Section: Train-track Coupling System Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some problems including passenger riding comfort, noise pollution, and even operational safety (Jin et al, 2013). Rail corrugation, rail welding irregularity, wheel burning, and wheel out-of-roundness (OOR) generate high-frequency components of the dynamic wheel-rail contact forces that contribute significantly to the total wheel-rail contact forces (Nielsen et al, 2003), and reduce the life of the components of track and vehicle, such as wheels, rails, and fasteners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%