Advances in Pile Foundations, Geosynthetics, Geoinvestigations, and Foundation Failure Analysis and Repairs 2011
DOI: 10.1061/47631(410)33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Risk Evaluation Method of Water Inrush and Integrated Geological Prediction Technology in High-Risk Karst Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, according to the established evaluation index system, the relative importance of any two indices at each level is analyzed by the 1~9 scale method (see Table 2) [41]. Then, the judgment matrix M can be constructed by the Formula (6).…”
Section: Subjective Weight Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, according to the established evaluation index system, the relative importance of any two indices at each level is analyzed by the 1~9 scale method (see Table 2) [41]. Then, the judgment matrix M can be constructed by the Formula (6).…”
Section: Subjective Weight Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water inrush in tunnels is affected by many factors, such as hydrology, geology, and construction, and it is complex, fuzzy, and random. In recent years, many researchers and engineers have made great efforts to assess the risk of tunnel water inrush, and have developed various methods of analysis, including the geological analysis method [6], the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method [7,8], the neural network method [9,10], the geographic information system (GIS) method [11,12], and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method [13,14]. Although these methods provide a theoretical basis to analyze the risk of water inrush, there still have some shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, comprehensive composite forecast methods, rather than single geological forecast methods, are recommended for a synthetic analysis. These forecast methods include tunnel seismic prediction, ground-penetrating radar, and the transient electromagnetic method [51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And it brings great security risks and economic losses (Li, Li, & Cui 2008;Qian & Rong 2008;Zhang et al 2011), as shown in table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%