Study on post occupancy evaluation after remodeling in accordance with the ‘green remodeling certification standards of existing non-residential buildings’- Focusing on the case of H building

The Early Case for Stabilization and Sustainability of Korean G-SEED Based on Collaborative Governance: A Theoretical Review

“…The committee, which included architecture and environment-related associations, academic societies, and industry experts, reviewed and proposed directions for upgrading and revising G-SEED. In addition, certification standards were drafted through workshops and forums, and they had to go through deliberation by the Green Building Certification Steering Committee [47]. Among the G-SEED stakeholders, the group that demonstrated the best capacity for joint actions was the technical committee members commissioned by the KICT.…”

“…From its inception, G-SEED faced a series of challenges, such as the need to add changed global standards (LCA) as certification items, global greenhouse gas reduction, request for revision of certification standards, and adjustment of difficulty according to technological development. In addition, under the collaborative governance regime, problems arose consecutively, such as negligent management and supervision by the operating institution, the absence of creative design evaluation items, and the level of certification evaluation centered on specific buildings [17,40,45,47].…”

“…In the innovative design field, an additional 10 points can be added to the basic score (100 points). ( 4) Green building experts (G-SEED Integrated Designer) who had completed relevant training at the KICT or KIRA (Korea Institute of Registered Architects) participated in the design process from the initial stage, so that integrated design could be achieved [44,47].…”