2008
DOI: 10.11361/journalcpij.43.3.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Planning and Implementation of Landscape Plan Legislated in landscape Act : Case Studies of Landscape Plans decided in the early stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To create harmonious streetscapes in Japan, building heights and setbacks can be directly controlled through streetscape‐promoting district planning, such as that stipulated in the City Planning Act, or through streetscape control standards under the Landscape Act (Murakami and Murahashi, 2003; Koura, 2008; Sato et al, 2008; Osawa, Nakai, and Nakanishi, 2010; Aoki and Deguchi, 2022). Although streetscape‐promoting district planning can be legally established to directly regulate building heights and setbacks by setting a maximum building height and minimum building setback instead of zoning regulations (the maximum FAR and other building height regulations), such planning fails to create harmonious streetscape skeletons because the minimum building height and maximum building setback cannot be legally mandated in Japan, which means that variability in building heights and setbacks is inevitable (Murakami and Murahashi, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create harmonious streetscapes in Japan, building heights and setbacks can be directly controlled through streetscape‐promoting district planning, such as that stipulated in the City Planning Act, or through streetscape control standards under the Landscape Act (Murakami and Murahashi, 2003; Koura, 2008; Sato et al, 2008; Osawa, Nakai, and Nakanishi, 2010; Aoki and Deguchi, 2022). Although streetscape‐promoting district planning can be legally established to directly regulate building heights and setbacks by setting a maximum building height and minimum building setback instead of zoning regulations (the maximum FAR and other building height regulations), such planning fails to create harmonious streetscape skeletons because the minimum building height and maximum building setback cannot be legally mandated in Japan, which means that variability in building heights and setbacks is inevitable (Murakami and Murahashi, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%