2012
DOI: 10.4236/mme.2012.21003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Performance of Laminar Taylor-Couette Flow with Different Developed Procedures

Abstract: The performance of laminar Taylor-Couette flow with different developed procedures is studied by the way of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in steady state. In order to gain a group of developed procedure in CFD, a set of convergent solutions are used as the initial value of next boundary condition, and the new set of convergent solutions are regarded as developing from the previous steady state. Three groups of developed procedures are gained from the rotating speed series of inner cylinder, respectively f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we start our iteration from a fluid at rest, we may simply view it as a sharp increase of the speed of the boundary (in less than a timestep). Numerical studies ( [7]) show that we obtain a different steady state whether we start from a fluid at rest and increase sharply the speed, increase gradualy (at each step) the speed or start from a faster moving state and gradualy decrease the speed. A single, non-linear step may not differentiate between them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we start our iteration from a fluid at rest, we may simply view it as a sharp increase of the speed of the boundary (in less than a timestep). Numerical studies ( [7]) show that we obtain a different steady state whether we start from a fluid at rest and increase sharply the speed, increase gradualy (at each step) the speed or start from a faster moving state and gradualy decrease the speed. A single, non-linear step may not differentiate between them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%