2016
DOI: 10.5307/jbe.2016.41.1.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Optimal Working Conditions for Picking Head of Self-Propelled Pepper Harvester by Factorial Test

Abstract: Purpose: Pepper prices have risen continuously because of a decrease in cultivation area; therefore, mechanical harvesting systems for peppers should be developed to reduce cost, time, and labor during harvest. In this study, a screw type picking head for a self-propelled pepper harvester was developed, and the optimal working conditions were evaluated considering helix types, winding directions of helix, and rotational speeds of the helix. Methods: The screw type was selected for the picking head after analyz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the above analysis shows that either too fast or too slow picking roller speeds will lead to an increase in the ground drop loss of pod peppers, and faster speeds will increase the damage rate of pod peppers. Kang et al designed an inclined auger pepper harvesting test stand [20], which determined the optimum speed for pepper picking by analyzing the effect of speed on the efficiency of pepper harvesting but did not further optimize this speed. As a result, the efficiency of the bench test was low, which increased the development cycle of the pepper harvester.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results Of The Single-factor Simulation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, the above analysis shows that either too fast or too slow picking roller speeds will lead to an increase in the ground drop loss of pod peppers, and faster speeds will increase the damage rate of pod peppers. Kang et al designed an inclined auger pepper harvesting test stand [20], which determined the optimum speed for pepper picking by analyzing the effect of speed on the efficiency of pepper harvesting but did not further optimize this speed. As a result, the efficiency of the bench test was low, which increased the development cycle of the pepper harvester.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Results Of The Single-factor Simulation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the harvesting process of pod pepper shows that based on the experience of pepper harvesting, the damage in the harvesting process is mainly concentrated in the picking process, while the damage in the transportation and cleaning processes is relatively low [14][15][16][17][18]. The collision between pod pepper and comb fingers during the picking process can be divided into two stages: elastic deformation and damage.…”
Section: Mechanical Analysis Of Contact Between Pod Pepper and Comb F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yung-Etgar Institute of Agricultural Machinery, Israel, developed two-and four-row self-propelled pepper harvesters with tilting and unfolding double-spiral mechanisms as the picking device [15]. In 2008 Funk PA and Walker S J years tested five picking mechanisms for five varieties in two fields in Sego State, New County The results surface that the tilting and reversing double-opening spiral design of the pepper picking device with low relative tip speed had the highest harvesting efficiency and lowest breakage rate [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%