2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2022.3220246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on Obstacle Avoidance Strategy Using Multiple Ultrasonic Sensors for Spherical Underwater Robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite various developed CCPP algorithms, the special operation mode makes them not perfectly appropriate for AUH's navigation control strategy. The existence of an obstacle is perceived by the distance information given by a horizontally mounted single beam range sonar/echo sounder (as can be seen in Figure 2), and it obviously distinguishes from other robots, on which LiDAR [23], infrared distance sensor, ultrasonic sensor [24], millimeter wave radar [25], camera, and multi-beam sonar [26], etc. are frequently used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite various developed CCPP algorithms, the special operation mode makes them not perfectly appropriate for AUH's navigation control strategy. The existence of an obstacle is perceived by the distance information given by a horizontally mounted single beam range sonar/echo sounder (as can be seen in Figure 2), and it obviously distinguishes from other robots, on which LiDAR [23], infrared distance sensor, ultrasonic sensor [24], millimeter wave radar [25], camera, and multi-beam sonar [26], etc. are frequently used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various sensor-based approaches are employed in underwater robotics for obstacle detection and navigation in their immediate environment. Commonly used techniques for obstacle avoidance include sonar [3,4], cameras [5,6], or LiDAR [7][8][9]. Current underwater imaging sonar technologies such as the Farsounder-1000 (Farsounder, Warwick, RI, USA), EchoPilot FLS 3D (Daniamant, Slangerup, Denmark), and Echoscope4G (Coda Octopus, Edinburgh, UK) are used for obstacle avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two classic algorithms mentioned above can basically realize the local planning for most robots in most static environments, but these algorithms do not take the movement information of obstacles into consideration, and they all regard obstacles as static obstacles, which causes the planned trajectory to be only currently optimal, regardless of the future positions of the obstacles, so the obstacle avoidance effect in a dynamic environment is not good enough. However, robot obstacle avoidance is systematic work that not only needs path planners [18,19] but also needs to combine obstacle perception [20,21], robot control [22], trajectory tracking [23,24], and localization [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%