The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2020
DOI: 10.1177/0954408920946024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on micro cutting fundamentals considering the cutting edge radius and the workpiece material in micro end milling

Abstract: Previous studies found that the peripheral cutting edge and end cutting edge in micro end milling had different cutting phenomena considering the size effect in micro cutting processes. This paper is a further study on this point considering different workpiece materials and cutting edge radii. Finite element simulations have been conducted to determine the minimum undeformed chip thickness (MUCT) by the chip morphology and the results are verified by micromilling experiments. Both the simulations and experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, excessive feed per tooth values are not suitable to be selected, otherwise it will make the cutting force increase, leading to larger deformation of thin walls. Therefore, the thin wall cutting parameters are determined as shown in Table 3 based on previous studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, excessive feed per tooth values are not suitable to be selected, otherwise it will make the cutting force increase, leading to larger deformation of thin walls. Therefore, the thin wall cutting parameters are determined as shown in Table 3 based on previous studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Finite Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the feed per tooth should be carefully selected and greater than the minimum undeformed chip thickness. The cutting parameters are determined as shown in Table 2 based on previous studies [13][14][15][16][17][18]. The attributes of the tool and workpiece used in the experiment are shown in Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Balazs et al [11], size e↵ects do not correlate linearly with tool size reduction. Even though there may be a linear relationship between t c and the tool cutting edge radius, the workpiece grain size is also highly relevant, as stated by Li et al [12]. For t in the same order of magnitude of grain size, chip formation might occur within a few or only a single grain of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%