2015
DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2015.1077170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on long-term radiation exposure analysis after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident: validation of the EU long-term radiation exposure model (ERMIN)

Abstract: The Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident led to the dispersion of radioactive material by wind that resulted in soil and air pollution over a wide area. Even now, more than 150,000 people in Fukushima prefecture are still relocated from their homes. In order to estimate how long such relocation might continue, we estimated radiation exposures for the 10 years following the accident that occurred on 12 March 2011, using European model for inhabited areas (ERMIN) developed by a partnership of several … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kim's paper, the resuspension does not occur under wind conditions of lower than 3 m/s [30], therefore, the resuspension effect was neglected in this study. Based on resistance theory, deposition velocity is mainly determined by the roughness of subsurface and resistance from the constant layer and quasi laminar boundary layer [29][30][31][32][33]. Previous studies in Beijing conclude that the resistance is determined by the atmosphere conditions, wind speed specifically, and conclude an empirical model to calculate the deposition velocity [34,35].…”
Section: Estimating Of the Dry Removal Efficiency Of Pm 10 And Pm 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Kim's paper, the resuspension does not occur under wind conditions of lower than 3 m/s [30], therefore, the resuspension effect was neglected in this study. Based on resistance theory, deposition velocity is mainly determined by the roughness of subsurface and resistance from the constant layer and quasi laminar boundary layer [29][30][31][32][33]. Previous studies in Beijing conclude that the resistance is determined by the atmosphere conditions, wind speed specifically, and conclude an empirical model to calculate the deposition velocity [34,35].…”
Section: Estimating Of the Dry Removal Efficiency Of Pm 10 And Pm 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difference between Equation (3) in this study and the empirical formula of NUREG/CR-7161, the deposition velocities of PM 10 and PM 2.5 were considered as a whole and were not regarded as an independent variable here. Even so, compared with the results acquired from the empirical formula which used the cumulative probability density function of deposition velocity (NUREG/CR-7161; Z 0 = 10 m, V = 2 m•s −1 ) [30], the distribution tendency of the data on the wetland and bare land in this study agreed with this formula, as well as the ranging from 0.0001 to 1.2263 cm•s −1 , as shown in Figure 5. The structure of this model is relatively simple, and the data required are easy to collect compared with the physical process-based model [35].…”
Section: Removal Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air concentrations of 133 Xe, 131 I, 132 I, 133 I, 132 Te, 134 Cs, 136 Cs, and 137 Cs in the early stage after FDNPP accident were estimated for six locations in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, from pulse height distributions measured with NaI(Tl) scintillation detectors continuously operated as a part of monitoring station systems [32]. For validation of the EU long-term radiation exposure model, long-term radiation exposure analysis after FDNPP accident was studied [33].…”
Section: Editorial Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%