Study on Identifying Significant Risk Sources during Bridge Construction Based on Grey Entropy Correlation Analysis Method

Abstract

Nowadays, many methods have been used in the identification of bridge risk sources, and certain results have been achieved. However, the research on the identification of significant risk sources of bridges during the construction period is relatively weak, and these methods still have some defects, such as the correlation between risk sources is not considered comprehensively, the dynamic risk sources are not fully considered, and the weight assignment is highly subjective. In order to solve these problems, this paper comprehensively uses the combination of expert scoring method, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP), and grey entropy correlation analysis (GECA) to identify significant risk sources during bridge construction. Firstly, the F-AHP and expert scoring method are used to initially identify safety sources during the bridge construction period, which effectively considers the identification of dynamic risk sources. Secondly, the combination of the GRA method and EW method is applied to identify the significant risk sources during bridge construction period, which can effectively analyze the interrelationship between different factors and greatly reduce the interference of subjective factors in the weight assignment, so as to effectively control the risks in construction and protect the health of the bridge structure and property losses. Finally, the feasibility and rationality of the proposed method were verified by comparing the AHP and GECA proposed in this paper in combination with specific engineering examples, which provides a reference basis for the identification of significant risk sources during the follow-up bridge construction period.

Analysis of key factors of gas content in fold area based on grey entropy correlation theory

“…Grey entropy correlation analysis method requires a small number of samples, and it does not need a very typical distribution law when analyzing the data. The results are presented in a combination of qualitative and quantitative ways, and it has been applied in many fields such as economy, society, agriculture and industry [13][14][15][16] .…”

Safety Risk Evaluation of Large and Complex Bridges during Construction Based on the Delphi‐Improved FAHP‐Factor Analysis Method

“…e traditional expert scoring comparison method uses the 1-9 scale method [26], while Table 1 shows that the distribution of the affiliation function is 0 to 1 to ensure that the overall affiliation interval is 0 to 1. erefore, the refinement process of the severity level and the possibility level is realized by linear interpolation, which refines these two levels from 1 scale to the 0 to 1 scale, and this shift can effectively improve the calculation accuracy and unify the interval variables for special bridge construction. e stability and reliability of the risk level estimation results are guaranteed [27].…”

Manajemen Risiko Pada Proyek Konstruksi Jembatan: Kajian Literatur Sistematis

“…Di Polandia (Duchaczek & Skorupka, 2016) penggunaan metode AHP akan memungkinkan untuk mengukur risiko kerusakan fasilitas jembatan dalam aspek potensi serangan teroris. Jurnal yang dibuat di China (K. Wang et al, 2021) menyebutkan meskipun perhitungan metode ini mungkin rumit, metode ini secara efektif mempertimbangkan korelasi yang melekat antara faktor sumber risiko dan mengurangi campur tangan faktor subjektif dalam proses penentuan bobot. Di Indonesia WBS standar berbasis risiko dapat digunakan sebagai dasar perencanaan kualitas, membantu pelaksana proyek mengenali pekerjaan proyek secara detail dan menentukan tujuan kualitas untuk setiap item dalam akurasi yang lebih besar sebagai alat untuk menjamin setiap pekerjaan telah mempertimbangkan persyaratan untuk merespon kualitas risiko terkait (Pratita & Latif, 2018).…”