“…The theater ballistic missile defense published by the American Aeronautical Society brings together the innovative research results of many missile defense experts in the United States and Israel, and proposes to consider the impact of combat style on the early warning time, identification probability and tracking accuracy of electronic countermeasure equipment from the perspective of system confrontation. After decades of research and exploration, great achievements have been made in the effectiveness evaluation of electronic countermeasures [4,5]. The traditional efficiency evaluation methods mainly include analytic hierarchy process (AHP), network analysis (ANP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Monte Carlo method, system dynamics method and so on.…”
Section: Challenges Faced By Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Of Ew Equipment Systemsmentioning
The currently used evaluating method has such problems as complex evaluation index space, complexity of computation, low evaluation efficiency, and low systematicness and intellectualization, which is difficult to meet the requirements of operational effectiveness evaluation for ECM equipment. In order to guarantee the efficiency and accuracy of operational effectiveness evaluation, an integrated and systematic evaluation method was provided based on multi-views system’s simulation model architecture, which can show the actual frameworks of equipment system for evaluation, we describe the element, structure, operational process and index system in a standardized manner. Furthermore, a framework of Flexible-intelligent Evaluation towards Combat-capability Space in System-of-systems (FECSS) was proposed. The FECSS method builds a bi-directional mapping relation between the upper and low operational effectiveness indicators by basic indicators-formed space in system-of-systems which combined the complex evaluation index, evaluation process with intelligent evaluation model. The proposed method can effectively analysis the effectiveness results in condition of different types and numbers of equipment. It also makes the electronic countermeasure equipment project demonstration and operational application more feasibly and practically.
“…The theater ballistic missile defense published by the American Aeronautical Society brings together the innovative research results of many missile defense experts in the United States and Israel, and proposes to consider the impact of combat style on the early warning time, identification probability and tracking accuracy of electronic countermeasure equipment from the perspective of system confrontation. After decades of research and exploration, great achievements have been made in the effectiveness evaluation of electronic countermeasures [4,5]. The traditional efficiency evaluation methods mainly include analytic hierarchy process (AHP), network analysis (ANP), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, Monte Carlo method, system dynamics method and so on.…”
Section: Challenges Faced By Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Of Ew Equipment Systemsmentioning
The currently used evaluating method has such problems as complex evaluation index space, complexity of computation, low evaluation efficiency, and low systematicness and intellectualization, which is difficult to meet the requirements of operational effectiveness evaluation for ECM equipment. In order to guarantee the efficiency and accuracy of operational effectiveness evaluation, an integrated and systematic evaluation method was provided based on multi-views system’s simulation model architecture, which can show the actual frameworks of equipment system for evaluation, we describe the element, structure, operational process and index system in a standardized manner. Furthermore, a framework of Flexible-intelligent Evaluation towards Combat-capability Space in System-of-systems (FECSS) was proposed. The FECSS method builds a bi-directional mapping relation between the upper and low operational effectiveness indicators by basic indicators-formed space in system-of-systems which combined the complex evaluation index, evaluation process with intelligent evaluation model. The proposed method can effectively analysis the effectiveness results in condition of different types and numbers of equipment. It also makes the electronic countermeasure equipment project demonstration and operational application more feasibly and practically.
“…Because there are a large number of causal factors in the process of completing the task for security system, it leads to the effectiveness of security system having a typical uncertainty and randomness. The current traditional effectiveness evaluation method such as ADC method, EDC method, index method [2], adversary sequence diagram method do not involve information uncertainty impact on the effectiveness for security system. Hence, it does not assess fully and accurately the effectiveness of security system with a high degree of information.…”
With the security industry developing rapidly and the number of security systems increasing continuously in recent years, security systems provide a positive effect on society security in China, but many of them became vulnerable or even useless because of the problem of irrational allocation of resources. In order to evaluate security system efficiency to avoid these problems, we present the concept of efficiency entropy based on the Shannon information theory, and build an Efficiency Entropy Evaluation Model which can be used to evaluate the efficiency of the security system quantitatively. It represents security system effectiveness in single node layer and the entire security network layers. So the effectiveness of the whole security system is calculated quantitatively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.