2019
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1479808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on energy properties and failure behaviors of heat-treated granite under static and dynamic compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1b and c show the geometric size of the specimens. Disc specimens were designed, and the diameter and thickness of the specimens were 50.0 mm and 25.0 mm, respectively, to reduce the influences of the inertial effect and end effect on the test results (Wang et al 2019a). The deviation of the height and diameter of specimen is within 0.50 mm during the processing.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1b and c show the geometric size of the specimens. Disc specimens were designed, and the diameter and thickness of the specimens were 50.0 mm and 25.0 mm, respectively, to reduce the influences of the inertial effect and end effect on the test results (Wang et al 2019a). The deviation of the height and diameter of specimen is within 0.50 mm during the processing.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic behaviors of rock after thermal treatments have been extensively studied (Zhang et al 2001;Li et al 2012;Huang and Xia 2015;Yu et al 2018;Wang et al 2019a). A series of dynamic behaviors, mainly including the dynamic compressive strength (Li et al 2020a), dynamic tensile strength (Mardoukhi et al 2017), and dynamic fracture toughness (Yin et al 2018), are commonly tested using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most researchers preferred the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) testing technique under a controlled laboratory setup. Before the second decade of the 21st century, most studies focused on the dynamic response of intact rocks or rock-like materials using the SHPB compression test [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In recent years, some studies have investigated the crack mechanism of jointed rock mass at higher loading rate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, extensive efforts have been dedicated to exploring the deformation and failure properties and revealing the damage behavior of rocks based on energy theory. Considerable results were also achieved through numerical and experimental methods (Peng et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2017Wang et al, , 2020aXiao et al, 2010). For example, through numerical analysis, Wasantha et al (2021) modeled the damage evolution behavior of rocklike materials with preexisting cracks and pores under uniaxial compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%