Study on Cyber Attack Damage Assessment Framework

Kim, Sung-Joong; Jang, Jisoo; Kwon, Oh-Jin; Kim, Ju-Youb; Shin, Dongkyoo

doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179977

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since information can influence how a battle turns out, it is crucial to evaluate the harm caused by hackers in between operations as specified in [21]. Using the cyber battle damage assessment framework suggested in this paper, the authors ran an experiment.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Threats, Effects, and Awareness of Cybercrime: A Survey

Arora

2024

IJSREM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of the digital age has ushered in unprecedented connectivity and convenience, but it has also brought about a surge in cybercrimes, posing significant challenges to security. Criminals exploit vulnerabilities in cyberspace to access sensitive information, perpetrate fraudulent activities, and undermine trust in online interactions. Despite the pervasive impact of cyber threats on various facets of society, awareness levels among the general populace remain a critical concern. This paper presents findings from a comprehensive survey aimed at assessing public awareness of cybercrimes and cybersecurity measures. The survey, conducted through a structured questionnaire, solicited responses from a diverse demographic sample, encompassing individuals' background information and their perceptions of cyber threats. Participants were queried on their familiarity with prevalent cyber scams, including phishing, email spoofing, lottery scams, credit card frauds, investment scams, vishing frauds, and gaming frauds. Key findings reveal gaps in awareness and understanding of cyber risks, underscoring the need for enhanced education and vigilance. Furthermore, insights into participants' responses regarding their experiences with cybercrimes, including measures taken to address incidents and financial losses incurred, shed light on the real-world impact of cyber threats. In conclusion, this paper emphasizes the importance of proactive measures to safeguard against cybercrimes and offers recommendations for bolstering cybersecurity awareness and resilience in the digital age. Key Words: Cybercrime, Scams, threats, Analysis, Awareness.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Threats, Effects, and Awareness of Cybercrime: A Survey

Arora

2024

IJSREM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…203 This includes recognition of the need to apply a complexity and systems thinking lens to the question of building an 'innovation ecosystem' within Defence that cultivates creativity, experimentation, challenge, informed risk taking and FARness at all levels, encouraging both top-down and bottom-up innovation. 204 While the innovation literature also speaks to wider, though not unrelated, issues such as improving the development and integration of software and emerging technologies, many of the underlying insights about 197 US Joint Chiefs (2019); Kim et al (2022).…”

Section:  Diversity Of Thoughtmentioning

confidence: 99%

Command and Control in the Future: Concept Paper 1: Grappling with Complexity

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The overarching study is being delivered by the Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) Strategic Analysis Support Contract (SASC) with the Global Strategic Partnership (GSP), a consortium of UK and international research organisations providing strategic analysis and academic support to the DCDC within the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD). This paper is intended to capture the findings of the first phase of the project and has been written on the assumption that it will be read by an audience with some familiarity with C2. Equally, it is intended to feed into the subsequent three papers in the series and therefore stops short of providing fulsome coverage of all aspects of thinking about C2 in the future, including the development of concrete recommendations.The GSP is led by RAND Europe, part of the RAND Corporation, an independent, not-for-profit research institute that aims to improve policy and decision making through objective research and analysis. RAND's clients include Allied governments, militaries, inter-and non-governmental organisations, and others with a need for rigorous, independent, interdisciplinary analysis.

show abstract

“…A previous study by this research team [12] presented a cyber combat damage assessment framework to evaluate the mission damage caused by cyber-attacks in military operations. The cyber battle damage assessment framework was composed of a hierarchical structure in the order of assets, functions, tasks, and missions based on the mission subordination structure of the US MITRE.…”

Section: Related Work a Cyber Mission-based Damage Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As discussed above, all the studies were conducted in a hierarchical structure with the concept that damage to assets affects missions. Similarly, in this study, it is composed of a 4-tier structure of asset-function-task-mission, and the research was conducted based on the framework presented in the previous research [12] of this research team.…”

Section: Func Acc Impactormentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mission Impact Analysis by Measuring the Effect on Physical Combat Operations Associated With Cyber Asset Damage

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As operations previously undertaken only in physical space in the past have changed to operations that include cyberspace, it is crucial to define the concept of ''cyber missions'' clearly. In this study, ''cyber mission'' refers to any military operation or process that utilizes cyber systems to perform actions in accordance with orders delivered to them. Because a weapon system that utilizes a cyber system executes actions based on the commands transmitted to the cyber system, it is necessary to analyze how attacks from cyberspace affects such a weapon system. To this end, it would be meaningful to analyze the tools used to analyze the mission impact of physical weapon systems linked to cyber-attacks. The US military's Joint Munitions Effectiveness Manual (JMEM), which contains the results of analyzing the effects of weapon systems, does not include analysis results for the effects of weapon systems on cyber-attacks. In this study, based on the analysis of the effectiveness of physical warfare, the damage to cyber assets was quantified and associated to calculate the cyber index for the analysis of operational efficiency. In connection with JMEM, the results of combat in cyberspace and the effects of physical operations were compared and analyzed to propose a framework to judge the impact of missions, and the performance was tested. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework, domestic and foreign operational scenarios were analyzed and designed, assets were defined, and experiments were conducted. These experiments showed that a greater decrease in the cyber mission effect value was related to a greater effect on physical operations. This framework could be used in a variety of operations to predict the physical impact of a cyber-attack and will help determine the next step in an operation.INDEX TERMS Cyber warfare, cyberspace, cyber operation, cyber weapon system, mission impact analysis.

show abstract

Study on Cyber Attack Damage Assessment Framework

Cited by 5 publications

References 9 publications

Threats, Effects, and Awareness of Cybercrime: A Survey

Threats, Effects, and Awareness of Cybercrime: A Survey

Command and Control in the Future: Concept Paper 1: Grappling with Complexity

Mission Impact Analysis by Measuring the Effect on Physical Combat Operations Associated With Cyber Asset Damage

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About