2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on chemical solution deposition of aluminum-doped zinc oxide films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result was also reported by others (Li et al, 2010). Moroever, the increase in the annealing temperatures causes the atoms to receive a more diffuse activation energy and then to migrate into the energetically favorable site in the crystal lattice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar result was also reported by others (Li et al, 2010). Moroever, the increase in the annealing temperatures causes the atoms to receive a more diffuse activation energy and then to migrate into the energetically favorable site in the crystal lattice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It could be attributed to the formation of new nucleating centers due to the doping atoms (Oztas and Bedir, 2008). The preferential orientation of the (002) plane is related to the minimization of the surface energy while the subsequent decrease of the (002) peak relative intensity for higher doping concentration can be affected by the saturation of newer nucleating centers (Li et al, 2010;. The trend of decrease in relative intensity of (002) peak with increasing in doping content is similar to the study of previous work (Caglar, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low doping concentration, the increase in the (0 0 2) peak may be attributed to the formation of new nucleating centers due to dopant atoms resulting from the decrease of nucleation energy barrier [22]. The subsequent decrease of (0 0 2) peak intensity for higher doping concentration may be affected by the saturation of newer nucleating centers [22,23] and the segregation of amorphous cadmium components. Ohyama et al [24] studied the effect of aluminum content on the structure of ZnO:Al films, and thought the decrease of (0 0 2) peak could be due to the segregation of aluminum components at the grain boundary for the higher aluminum content, though no impurity phases were found from the XRD patterns [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this observation, it can be established that moderate doping of the Eu 3+ ions in the WO 3 lattice enhances their crystalline nature, while a high concentration of Eu 3+ ions decreases the crystalline behavior. The reason behind this reduction in crystallinity at a higher doping concentration can be understood from the following facts: (i) at a higher impurity concentration, the impurity atoms may segregate along the inter-particle boundary regions [ 22 ]; (ii) the addition of newer growth centers may become abstained at a higher impurity concentration [ 23 ]; (iii) the crystal reorientation effects become predominant at higher Eu 3+ concentrations [ 24 ]. These factors can considerably reduce the crystalline quality of WO 3 thin films with more Eu 3+ contents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%