2019
DOI: 10.1299/transjsme.18-00421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on cell culture processing system to improve task efficiency (Efficiency improvement of the injecting task using a robot in a media change process)

Abstract: In the field of regenerative medicine, cell processing is currently done manually. The process is labor intensive and expensive, and its efficiency must be improved. Automatic cell culture apparatuses equipped with a vertical articulated robot have been proposed recently. However, automating all tasks of cell processing complicates the system constitution. The present study aims to develop a simple and rational cell processing system by combining the tasks performed by a robot with those performed by a human. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 show the evaluation experiment results. According to our previous study [19], the standard deviation (3σ) when the operator performed the injecting task was 1.5 g, and the standard deviation (3σ) when the robot performed the injecting task using the conventional injection algorithm without correction was 1.18 g. On the other hand, both Algorithms A and B showed a better standard deviation (3σ) than the conventional injection algorithm without correction for all target volumes. Therefore, both algorithms can be used, and which one depends on the situation.…”
Section: Evaluation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11 show the evaluation experiment results. According to our previous study [19], the standard deviation (3σ) when the operator performed the injecting task was 1.5 g, and the standard deviation (3σ) when the robot performed the injecting task using the conventional injection algorithm without correction was 1.18 g. On the other hand, both Algorithms A and B showed a better standard deviation (3σ) than the conventional injection algorithm without correction for all target volumes. Therefore, both algorithms can be used, and which one depends on the situation.…”
Section: Evaluation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The method for improving the e ciency of the injecting task is shown in the previous study [19]. Figure 1 shows the injecting task performed by a robot in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations