2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on biocontrol of postharvest decay of table grapes caused by Penicillium rubens and the possible resistance mechanisms by Yarrowia lipolytica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mahunu et al (2016) reported that Pichia caribbica with phytic acid can induce the PAL, POD, and CAT in apples which help the fruit to combat the blue mold disease. Other researchers also confirmed the use of yeast alone or in combination can significantly induce the major disease defense-related enzymes and phenolic compounds in post-harvest fruits and vegetables (Li and Tian, 2006;Al-Qurashi and Awad, 2015;Qin et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2018;Abdelhai et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For example, Mahunu et al (2016) reported that Pichia caribbica with phytic acid can induce the PAL, POD, and CAT in apples which help the fruit to combat the blue mold disease. Other researchers also confirmed the use of yeast alone or in combination can significantly induce the major disease defense-related enzymes and phenolic compounds in post-harvest fruits and vegetables (Li and Tian, 2006;Al-Qurashi and Awad, 2015;Qin et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2018;Abdelhai et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…From an economic and social point of view, the grape ( Vitis vinifera L.) is one of the most widely cultivated fruit plants in the world and is susceptible to infections caused by pathogenic fungi [ 36 ]. Therefore, in recent times, the reduction in phytopathogenic fungi attacking the grape has also become of vital interest for vine growers in the post-harvest phase [ 37 ]. Microbiological applications to prevent infections represent a new strategic frontier for maintaining the post-harvest quality of table and wine grapes [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Yeast Applications Against Pathogenic Fungi Of the Grape In Post-harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…401/2006). Notably, it was demonstrated that the yeasts Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans and Yarrowia lipolytica ((Wickerham, Kurtzman & Herman) van der Walt & von Arx) are able to degrade these toxins [ 37 ]. Moreover, in 2017, Cordero-Bueso et al [ 49 ] selected four non- Saccharomyces yeasts ( P. kluyveri , Hanseniaspora uvarum ((Niehaus) Shehata, Mrak & Phaff ex M.Th.…”
Section: Yeast Applications Against Pathogenic Fungi Of the Grape In Post-harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudomonas aeruginosa PN1 produced IAA, cyanogens, solubilized phosphorus, siderophore, chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanase and improved the growth of chirpine seedlings along with exhibiting a strong antagonistic property against Macrophomina phaseolina [ 17 ]. In addition, inoculations with different Pseudomonas strains have triggered defense-related enzymes in plants, such as peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and polyphenoloxidase (PPO), indicating that they can produce induced systemic resistance against pathogens [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%