2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2005.03.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on ac losses of HTS coil carrying ac transport current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, L 0 can be found as that at which V c at low amplitudes has a real and imaginary harmonics with the same value, as is predicted for a circular wire[15]. Actually, both ways of determining L 0 are equivalent, since for the low field limit the first real harmonic approaches zero 6. (See previous footnote.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternatively, L 0 can be found as that at which V c at low amplitudes has a real and imaginary harmonics with the same value, as is predicted for a circular wire[15]. Actually, both ways of determining L 0 are equivalent, since for the low field limit the first real harmonic approaches zero 6. (See previous footnote.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Then, mainly for mechanical reasons, one of the most feasible ways of manufacturing a winding is to form a pancake coil (or sets of piled pancake coils). Up to this time, only a few theoretical works supported by experiments have been dedicated to the AC loss of pancake coils [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electromagnetic models of HTS devices using the Finite Element Method (FEM) have already been tested successfully by other teams, especially for AC losses computations [4]- [7], but meshing (high aspect ratio of coated conductors layers) as well as nonlinear convergence issues make these methods quite challenging to use [8]. We propose a more flexible approach based on a Volume Integral Formulation associated to the Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) method [9] and adapted to 2D axisymmetric problems, whose main advantage is to require a mesh for active regions only, particularly convenient for RE-BCO coil modeling as the active regions are only defined by the very thin superconducting layer (as long as the tape is not transiting, otherwise all conducting layers should be considered too, as well as a thermal coupling).…”
Section: Volume Integral Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%