2021
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11040406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Type II SPDC in Lithium Niobate for High Spectral Purity Photon Pair Generation

Abstract: Recent advances of high-quality lithium niobate (LN) on insulator technology have revitalized the progress of novel chip-integrated LN-based photonic devices and accelerated application research. One of the promising technologies of interest is the generation of entangled photon pairs based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in LNs. In this paper, we investigated, theoretically and numerically, Type II SPDC in two kinds of LNs—undoped and 5-mol% MgO doped LNs. In each case, both non-poled and per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The horizontal width of the graph falls within the full range of λ p that satisfies the Type II EPM. In this range, the d eff values span 8.40-11.13 pm/V, which are much larger than other cases using the Type II EPM approach, e.g., d eff = 1.50 pm/V for BBO under the BPM; 2.39 pm/V (=(2/π)d 24 ) for PPKTP and 2.77 pm/V (=(2/π)d 15 ) for PPLN, under the first-order QPM [10,26,27]. The largest values of d eff are 11.13 pm/V at 1062.78 nm, and the corresponding BPM direction is (θ, φ) = (63.8 • , 0 • ).…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The horizontal width of the graph falls within the full range of λ p that satisfies the Type II EPM. In this range, the d eff values span 8.40-11.13 pm/V, which are much larger than other cases using the Type II EPM approach, e.g., d eff = 1.50 pm/V for BBO under the BPM; 2.39 pm/V (=(2/π)d 24 ) for PPKTP and 2.77 pm/V (=(2/π)d 15 ) for PPLN, under the first-order QPM [10,26,27]. The largest values of d eff are 11.13 pm/V at 1062.78 nm, and the corresponding BPM direction is (θ, φ) = (63.8 • , 0 • ).…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Crystals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11 under the BPM; 2.39 pm/V (=(2/π)d24) for PPKTP and 2.77 pm/V (=(2/π)d15) for PPLN, under the first-order QPM [10,26,27]. The largest values of deff are 11.13 pm/V at 1062.78 nm, and the corresponding BPM direction is (θ, ϕ) = (63.8°, 0°).…”
Section: Simulations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be appreciated from the BPM conditions in Table 2, w is equal to ρ ω (for positive uniaxial crystals) or ρ 2ω (for negative uniaxial crystals), where ρ ω and ρ 2ω represent the walk-off angles of the e-waves with frequencies ω and 2ω, respectively. We note that for Type II, the relationship of ρ 2ω > ρ ω is valid in the uniaxial crystals considered in this study [59]. As expected from Equation (19), w is also given as a two-variable function for λ F and θ, and thus can be obtained by substituting a set of solutions for λ F and θ that satisfy the broadband SHG conditions in Table 2.…”
Section: Spatial Walk-offmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The d eff values calculated for the directions (θ BPM ) of the F-wave satisfying the broadband SHG conditions are listed in column 6 of Table 6. For all considered cases except CdSe, the d eff values are very large, from 7.5 pm/V to 163.6 pm/V, which are much larger than the maximum d eff for typical 5-mol% MgO-doped periodically poled LiNbO 3 (MgO:PPLN) using the first-order QPM: (2/π)d 31 = ~2.80 pm/V for Type I and II [59]. The walk-off angle w, calculated using the solution set of λ F and θ for the broadband SHG, are listed in column 7 of Table 6.…”
Section: Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 84%